- *No. 184 Protection From Discharge After Reemployment
- No. 0803 First Supreme Court Case on Reemployment Statute: Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp., 328 U.S. 275 (1946)
- No. 0823 Fourth Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 338 U.S. 278
- No. 0834 Sixth Supreme Court Case on Reemployment Statute Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 348 U.S. 960 (1955)
- No. 0844 Vacation Days: A recent settlement casts a new light on vacation accrual for Reservists who take time off for military training or service
- No. 0861 10th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Accardi v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 383 U.S. 225 (1966)
- No. 09003 Eleventh Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Eagar v. Magma Copper Co., 389 U.S. 323 (1967)
- No. 09007 12th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute: Foster v. Dravo Corp., 420 U.S. 92 (1975)
- No. 09009 Another New Case on USERRA Discrimination
- No. 09011 Layoffs and the Special Protection Period
- No. 09030 Justice Serves: DOJ sues Nevada and a Nevada corporation to enforce USERRA
- No. 10026 Special Protection against Discharge, Except for Cause
- No. 11010 USERRA Section 4302 Does Not Bar Settlement of USERRA Claim
- No. 11022 Supreme Court Reserves 7th Circuit USERRA Case
- No. 11034 Protection against Discharge after Reemployment
- No. 11073 Another Great USERRA Appellate Case
- No. 11094 Matthew King’s Application for UCX Did Not Justify His Firing
- No. 12015 USERRA’s Special Protection Period Against Discharge Upon Reemployment
- No. 12050 USERRA Applies to Short and Long Periods of Service
- No. 12052 Contractual Statute of Limitations Under USERRA
- No. 12093 USERRA’s Protection against Post-Reemployment Firing
- No. 13045 One Year of Back Pay Is not Enough
- No. 13110 Special Protection against Discharge, Except for Cause, After Returning from Military Service
- No. 13111 How to Compute One Year for Purposes of Section 4316(c) of USERRA
- No. 14046 Marine Corps Reservist Sues Village of Skokie for Violating USERRA
- No. 15053 USERRA 101 Final Exam
- No. 15094 Unfavorable Sixth Circuit USERRA Case
- No. 16054 Retroactive Pay Increase and Section 4318 of USERRA
- No. 17023 Pro Bono Attorney Does Great Job for USERRA Claimant
- No. 18053 Section 4316(c) of USERRA: Special Protection against Discharge after Reemployment
- No. 19066 You Must Meet USERRA’s Five Conditions for Reemployment to have the Right to an Accommodation for a Service-Connected Disability or The Right to the Special Protection against Discharge
- No. 20007 Important New USERRA Case—Part 1
- No. 20047 You Are Entitled to Reinstatement to the Job you Left and Would Have Retained even if that Means that Another Employee Must Be Displaced
- No. 21004 More on Successor in Interest and USERRA
- No. 21006 Am I Required To Participate in my Civilian Employer’s Investigation while I Am Deployed?
- No. 21007 How Does USERRA’s “Furlough or Leave of Absence” Clause Apply to your Airline’s “Crisis Time Off” Program?
- No. 21035 Am I Required To Participate in my Civilian Employer’s Investigation while I Am Deployed?
- No. 21053 DOL-VETS and DOJ Do well for Army Reservist.
- No. 21058 What Kind of a Job Am I Entitled to upon Reemployment?
- No. 21068 Firing the City Manager Violated USERRA.
- No. 21080 Your Employer Violated USERRA Willfully, But under Current Law You Are Not Entitled to Monetary Damages. USERRA Needs To Be Amended.
- No. 22014 USERRA’s Escalator Principle Is Great, But There Are Limits
X