- No. 09071 Federal Circuit Reverses the MSPB Yet Again – When Will They Ever Learn?
- No. 09070 Timely Application for Reemployment
- No. 09069 Only Really Serious Miscreants Lose Their Reemployment Rights for Misconduct During Service
- No. 09068 The Five Year Limit
- No. 09067 Prior Notice to Civilian Employer
- No. 09066 Relationship between the Uniformed Service and the Absence from the Position of Employment
- No. 09065 What is Service in the Uniformed Services?
- No. 09064 Held a Position of Employment
- No. 09063 You Must Apply for Reemployment – Part 3
- No. 09062 Don’t Chafe the Chaplain
- No. 09061 Your Civilian Job and USERRA: Beware of Gaps in Your Period of Service, And Maintain a Proper Balance of Military and Civilian Responsibilities
- No. 09060 SCRA Tolls the Running of Statutes of Limitations
- No. 09059 Congress Enacts New Provisions for Military Spouse Voting and Taxation
- No. 09058 Military Voting—What About State Elections?
- No. 09057 Veterans’ Preference: Here are the eligibility standards for veterans earning special credits for federal civilian jobs
- No. 09056 Bugged: Be cautious about recording conversations with employers for use in USERRA cases
- No. 09055 Congress Enacts Important New Protections for Military and Overseas Voters
- No. 09054 Military Service Is Not “Just Like Maternity Leave”
- No. 09053 Update OSC Settles USERRA Case with DHS
- No. 09053 Joint Employment Doctrine Under USERRA-Continued
- No. 09052 Section 4311 of USERRA Is Not Limited to Reserve Components
- No. 09051 What Happens to the Child When I Get Mobilized?
- No. 09050 Update Military Voting Rights in Virginia-Continued
- No. 09050 Military Voting Rights in Virginia
- No. 09049 Retroactive Seniority Adjustment to Your Civilian Seniority Date Based on Military Interruption of Your Civilian Career
- No. 09048 No Time Limit on Justice for the Returning Veteran—Part 2
- No. 09047 Improve The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
- *No. 09046 SCRA Does Not Protect You from Unreasonable Overdraft Fees
- No. 09045 Does “Health Insurance” Include Income Replacement Insurance?
- No. 09044 Get Out of Lease upon Mobilization
- No. 09043 Is it Unlawful To Deny a Loan Because of Reserve Component Membership?
- No. 09042 Attorney Fees under the SCRA
- No. 09041 Does the SCRA Create a Private Right of Action?
- No. 09040 The Ordinance and the Ordained—Part Two
- No. 09039 Let’s Try To Limit the Burden on Your Employer
- No. 09038 Due Process Clause Held To Apply to Veteran’s Claim
- No. 09037 You Must Apply for Reemployment-Part 2
- No. 09036 Ethan Allen Is Rolling Over in his Grave
- *No. 09035 SCRA’s New Cell-Phone Contract Termination Provision: A Welcome Provision, But Limited in Scope
- No. 09034 Another Good Precedent on Reemployment Rights
- No. 09033 Promotion and Pay Raise Delayed by Military Service–Am I Entitled to Back Pay?
- No. 09032 Furlough or Leave of Absence Clause Revisited
- No. 09031 DOJ Sues California Department of Corrections
- No. 09030 Justice Serves: DOJ sues Nevada and a Nevada corporation to enforce USERRA
- No. 09029 16th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute King v. St. Vincent’s Hospital, 502 U.S. 215 (1991)
- No. 09028 Not So ‘Harmless Error’: Supreme Court decides against veteran in claim process case
- No. 09027 Long-Term Full-Time National Guard Duty and the Five-Year Limit
- No. 09026 Mobilized Reservists and the Chicago Fire Department
- No. 09025 No Time Limit on Justice for the Returning Veteran
- No. 09024 Dot the I’s and Cross the T’s
- No. 09023 15th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Monroe v. Standard Oil Co. 452 U.S. 549 (1981)
- No. 09022 Update Supreme Court Agrees To Review Unfavorable 7th Circuit Case
- No. 09022 Is Personal Animus Discrimination? A USERRA case may be headed to the Supreme Court.
- No. 09021 Federal Circuit Again Reverses the MSPB for Ignoring Rights of Veterans
- No. 09020 USERRA’s Definition of Service Is Broad But Not Unlimited
- No. 09019 14th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Coffy v. Republic Steel Corp.,447 U.S. 191 (1980)
- No. 09018 DOJ Sues Alabama DMHMR
- No. 09017 Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of the SSCRA
- No. 09016 Getting One’s Retirement “Home of Selection” or Discharge “End of Tour of Service” Move Extended
- No. 09015 13th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Alabama Power Co. v. Davis, 431 U.S. 581 (1977)
- No. 09014 The Other Half of the Solomon Amendment As It Applies to College ROTC
- No. 09013 USERRA Covers Medical Exams While on TDRL
- No. 09012 Update DOJ Sues NC to Enforce USERRA Regarding a Magistrate Who Is a Reservist
- No. 09012 DOJ Sues NC to Enforce USERRA Regarding a Magistrate Who Is a Reservist
- No. 09011 Layoffs and the Special Protection Period
- No. 09010 You Must Apply for Reemployment after You Leave Active Duty
- No. 09009 Another New Case on USERRA Discrimination
- No. 09008 The SSCRA Means What It Says, Supreme Court Holds
- No. 09007 12th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Foster v. Dravo Corp., 420 U.S. 92 (1975)
- No. 09006 When Long Service Equals No Promotion You Don’t Need a Smoking Gun to Win a Section 4311 Case Under USERRA
- No. 09005 Do Life Insurance Salespersons Have USERRA Rights?
- No. 09004 How to Prove a USERRA Discrimination Case—Continued
- No. 09003 Eleventh Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Eagar v. Magma Copper Co., 389 U.S. 323 (1967)
- No. 09002 Naval Reservist Wins USERRA Case Against San Diego Police Department
- No. 09001 Update Smith v. United States Postal Service
- No. 09001 Non-Pecuniary Damages Available Under USERRA
X