1.4 USERRA Enforcement

No. 012 Enforcement of USERRA Rights
No. 024 Enforcement of Reemployment Rights Outside the U.S.
No. 061 Not Necessary To Establish Discriminatory Intent Under Section 4312
No. 065 Letter to Department of Justice Regarding USERRA
No. 065 Response DoJ Response to ROA letter Regarding USERRA
No. 067 Enforcement of USERRA Against Executive Agencies
No. 089 Enforcing USERRA Against A State
No. 089 Clarification
No. 093 USERRA Enforcement by OSC (Continued)
No. 108 Letter to Federal Agency Concerning USERRA Case Involving an Agency Employee
No. 115 Can the Employer Sue Me Under USERRA?
No. 148 Good News on USERRA Enforcement
No. 159 Waiving the Fee for Filing a USERRA Appeal
No. 163 USERRA Applies to State Department Non-Appropriated Fund Instrumentality at Embassy
No. 172 USERRA Has Teeth
No. 189 Appellate Review of MSPB Decisions on USERRA
No. 191 Sometimes David Does Beat Goliath
No. 197 Tutorial on USERRA Procedures
No. 200 Is Injunctive Relief Available in a USERRA Case?
No. 200-Update: Is Injunctive Relief Available in a USERRA Case?
No. 205 Recent USERRA Victory
No. 206 Computation of Damages in a USERRA Case
No. 0605 Demonstration Project on USERRA Enforcement Within the Federal Government
No. 0606 Can I Request DOJ Assistance After I Run out of Money To Pay My Lawyer?
No. 0611 Does USERRA Provide for Interest on Back Pay Awards?
No. 0614 Trilogy of New Rulings Affects Federal Employees
No. 0623 GAO Reports on USERRA Enforcement
No. 0632 I Want To Sue the Boss Personally
No. 0637 Does USERRA Apply to TSA Screeners?
No. 0706 Joint Employer Doctrine Revisited
No. 0707 KIA and USERRA: A claim can survive the death of the plaintiff
No. 0713 Willful USERRA Violation: Judge Determines Company’s Denial of Wrongdoing Is Not Credible
No. 0717 You Must Make an Effort To Mitigate Your Damages
No. 0722 Federal Circuit Reverses the MSPB, Again
No. 0726 MSPB Reversed, Yet Again
No. 0727 Federal Government Considered “Model Employer” Under USERRA
No. 0729 Kirkendall-VEOA and Equitable Tolling of Claim
No. 0730 Are Schedule C Employees Protected by USERRA?
No. 0731 Another Recent Case on Burden of Proof in USERRA
No. 0733 City of Columbus Held Not Liable for Suicide of Returning Veteran
No. 0734 GAO Reports on USERRA Enforcement
No. 0737 Right to Trial by Jury under USERRA
No. 0745 Recent Ohio Supreme Court Case on USERRA Enforcement
No. 0747 Russell v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
No. 0750 Target Hit: National Guard Member Wins USERRA Case Plus Tort Damages Under State Law
No. 0752 Habit Forming: Federal Circuit Reverses MSPB Two More Times
No. 0753 A “Motivating Factor”: USERRA Case Reiterates That Military Duty Need Only Contribute To Termination Of Employment To Be A Violation Of Law
No. 0754 Firmer Teeth: Legislation Introduced to Enhance USERRA Enforcement
No. 0755 The Federal Case: A Description of USERRA’s Enforcement Mechanisms for Complaints by Federal Government Employees
No. 0758 Taking the Leap: Employer cover-up fools DOL, but not the jury
No. 0761 Veterans’ Preference Act requires a federal agency to waive maximum age rule.
No. 0763 The Office of Personnel Management Has Specific Responsibilities Under USERRA
No. 0810 Attempt To Expedite USERRA Enforcement Process
No. 0813 Despite Its Longtime Contention, AAFES Is NOT Exempt From USERRA
No. 0815 New Reporting Requirement for ESGR Cases
No. 0825 Hard Cases Make Bad Law
No. 0826 Hard Cases Make Bad Law-Continued
No. 0844 Vacation Days: A recent settlement casts a new light on vacation accrual for Reservists who take time off for military training or service
No. 0847 Proposed Servicemembers Access to Justice Act
No. 0847 Update: Proposed Servicemembers Access to Justice Act
No. 0848 Enforcing USERRA against a State—Part 2
No. 0849 Unlawful to Fire Army Recruit
No. 0852 Intelligence Not Superior: USERRA applies to Intelligence agencies
No. 0857 You Cannot Waive Your Reemployment Rights Until You Return from Service
No. 0858 Right to Jury Trial and Liquidated Damages Survives Death of the Unlawfully Fired Employee
No. 0860 Harassment Is a Cognizable Claim under USERRA
No. 09001 Non-Pecuniary Damages Available Under USERRA
No. 09001-Update Non-Pecuniary Damages Available Under USERRA
No. 09002 Naval Reservist Wins USERRA Case Against San Diego Police Department
No. 09004 How to Prove a USERRA Discrimination Case—Continued
No. 09006 When Long Service Equals No Promotion You Don’t Need a Smoking Gun to Win a Section 4311 Case Under USERRA
No. 09009 Another New Case on USERRA Discrimination
No. 09010 You Must Apply for Reemployment after You Leave Active Duty
No. 09012 DOJ Sues NC to Enforce USERRA Regarding a Magistrate Who Is a Reservist
No. 09012 Update: DOJ Sues NC to Enforce USERRA Regarding a Magistrate Who Is a Reservist
No. 09018 DOJ Sues Alabama DMHMR
No. 09022 Is Personal Animus Discrimination? A USERRA case may be headed to the Supreme Court.
No. 09022-Update Supreme Court Agrees To Review Unfavorable 7th Circuit Case
No. 09030 Justice Serves: DOJ sues Nevada and a Nevada corporation to enforce USERRA
No. 09031 DOJ Sues California Department of Corrections
No. 09034 Another Good Precedent on Reemployment Rights
No. 09036 Ethan Allen Is Rolling Over in his Grave
No. 09037 You Must Apply for Reemployment-Part 2
No. 09053 Joint Employment Doctrine Under USERRA-Continued
No. 09053-Update OSC Settles USERRA Case with DHS
No. 09056 Bugged: Be cautious about recording conversations with employers for use in USERRA cases
No. 09063 You Must Apply for Reemployment – Part 3
No. 10011 An Instructive New USERRA Case from Ohio
No. 10012 You Only Get One Chance To Make Your Case
No. 10014 11th Amendment Does Not Bar Suit against a State by the United States
No. 10015 Escalator Principle Applies to Entire Period of Military-Related Absence
No. 10017 DLA Violates USERRA
No. 10027 DOJ Sues Company and Settles the Same Day
No. 10026 Special Protection against Discharge, Except for Cause
No. 10031 DOJ Files and Settles on the Same Day, Again
*No. 10028 A Case Study of 38 U.S.C. Sections 4311 and 4312: Erickson v. United States Postal Service
No. 10029 You Can Sue a Political Subdivision Under USERRA
No. 10037 USERRA and Veterans’ Preference Laws Apply to California Court System
No. 10044 Federal Agency Employer Cannot Make You Quit the Reserves
No. 10046 USERRA Damages Can Be Awarded for Lost Military Pay
No. 10049 Injunctive Relief under USERRA
No. 10051 Alabama Ordered To Comply with USERRA
No. 10054 Don’t Do Your Reserve Work on Your Employer’s Time
No. 10066 USERRA Overrides Federal Agency Rule on “Outside Employment”
No. 10080 Congress Orders a New Demonstration Project on USERRA Enforcement
No. 10082 USERRA and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, Offer of Judgment: Awards of Plaintiff’s Attorney Fees and Prohibition of Charging Costs Under USERRA Are Not Affected by Rule 68.
No. 10087 USERRA Forbids Discrimination in Initial Employment
No. 11003 The MSPB Is Finally Catching On
No. 11006 Important New Case on USERRA Discrimination
No. 11010 USERRA Section 4302 Does Not Bar Settlement of USERRA Claim
No. 11011 DOJ Settles USERRA Suit Against Titan Laboratories
No. 11012 Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment for Employer
No. 11019 USERRA and Public Sector Pension Plans
No. 11028 Erickson v. United States Postal Service – Recent Implications to 38 U.S.C. 4311 & 4312
No. 11029 Tax Records in USERRA Cases: How Both Parties May Obtain Each Other’s Private Financial Records
No. 11030 Does USERRA Provide a Remedy for Employer Harassment?
No. 11034 Protection against Discharge after Reemployment
No. 11040 Suing a State Government Employer under USERRA
No. 11044 PTSD, USERRA, and the State of New Mexico
No. 11049 Another Case on State Sovereign Immunity under USERRA
No. 11052 DOL Closing Case as “Without Merit” Does Not Bind Claimant
No. 11058 Letter to DOJ about USERRA Enforcement
No. 11068 USERRA Protects the Co-Worker Who Testifies or Provides Information in a USERRA Case
No. 11067 Unfavorable 8th Circuit USERRA Case
No. 11073 Another Great USERRA Appellate Case
No. 11074 Why Does a Case Take so Long?
No. 11075 The National Guard Must Be a Model Employer under USERRA
No. 11080 It Is Not Your Responsibility to Find a Replacement
No. 11081 Does DOL Delay Count Against Me in Timeliness of My Lawsuit?
No. 11082 Does USERRA Apply to Me?
No. 11088 You Can Sue a City in Federal Court under USERRA
No. 11094 Matthew King’s Application for UCX Did Not Justify His Firing
No. 11095 USERRA and the State of New Mexico—Part 2
No. 11102 Bunting v. Town of Ocean City Comes to a Conclusion
No. 11111 Conflict Between National Guard Drill and Civilian Job
No. 12008 What Happens to My Stock Option Plan When I Get Mobilized?
No. 12010 Working at Your Civilian Job Prior to Reporting for Active Duty
No. 12011 Harassment as USERRA Violation
No. 12020 Reservists Should Be Permitted to Take Licensed Customs Broker Exams
No. 12024 Alternative Way to Enforce USERRA Against a State Government Employer
No. 12030 DOJ Sues UAL to Enforce USERRA Pension Rights of Air Guard Member
No. 12031 USERRA Plaintiff Does Not Have to Pay Filing Fee
No. 12032 Eleventh Circuit Affirms Judgment Against Alabama for Violating USERRA
No. 12033 Federal Arbitration Act Severely Limits Review of Arbitrator’s Erroneous Ruling
No. 12035 OPM Director Announces Zero Toleration for USERRA Violations
No. 12036 ESGR Serving 40 Years and Counting
No. 12040 DOJ Sues Home Depot for Violating USERRA
No. 12043 Senator Introduces Bill to Improve USERRA
No. 12047 Minnesota Passes Legislation on USERRA
No. 12049 NY Court: Calculations for Military and Regular Leave Benefits Not the Same
No. 12050 USERRA Applies to Short and Long Periods of Service
No. 12052 Contractual Statute of Limitations Under USERRA
No. 12055 A Small Sacrifice Asked of the 99.25%
No. 12061 DOJ Settles USERRA Suit Filed Against United Airlines
No. 12067 Is Harassment a Cognizable Claim under USERRA—(Continued)
No. 12069 DOJ Sues Commonwealth of PA to Enforce USERRA and Secures a Great Settlement
No. 12070 Civilian Pension Credit for Military Service Time before 1994
No. 12075 Sixth Circuit Holds that Nashville-Davidson County Willfully Violated USERRA and Must Pay Liquidated Damages
No. 12076 Presidential Memorandum Gives Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) Guidance to Federal Employers
No. 12082 DOJ Gets Job Back for Mobilized Navy Reservist
No. 12083 DOJ Files Class Action USERRA Lawsuit against NYC
No. 12086 TSA Screeners Now Finally Have Enforceable USERRA Rights
No. 12096 Army Cadet Command Implicitly Admits that it Violated USERRA in its Treatment of ROTC Employee Michael Hanke
No. 12099 There’s a Hole in USERRA. Will States Fill it if Congress Won’t?
No. 12102 Coast Guard Reservist Mobilized Soon After Hired for New Job
No. 12103 Pension Credit for 1980s Military Service
No. 12108 DOJ Sues NC School District on Behalf of Army Reservist
No. 12109 USERRA Forbids Discrimination with respect to Retention in Employment
No. 12115 Good News from Rhode Island on Enforcing USERRA against a State Agency as Employer
No. 12114 USERRA Does Not Apply to PHS Selection of PHS Officers
No. 12118 DOJ Sues NYC Internet Business for Violating USERRA
No. 12119 USERRA Forbids Discrimination in Employment Based on Uniformed Service—Not Limited to Reserve Component Service
No. 12120 Make the States Waive Sovereign Immunity Concerning USERRA Lawsuits or Lose Federal Funding—No, that Won’t Work
No. 12122 Does USERRA Violate the 10th Amendment?
No. 13004 USERRA Does Not Provide for Reemployment of Active Duty Service Member Who Starts Job while on Active Duty and Seeks Reemployment after a Deployment
No. 13021 Sergeant Major Erickson’s Struggle against the United States Postal Service Continues
No. 13022 The Escalator Can Descend as well as Ascend
No. 13025 The Escalator and the Sequester
No. 13027 ROA Files USERRA Amicus Brief in NM Appellate Court
No. 13028 DOJ Files Amicus Brief in NM Court of Appeals
No. 13029 Supreme Court Case Points Way to Effective Enforcement of USERRA against State Government Employers
No. 13031 State of Nevada Finally Complies with USERRA
No. 13032 A Great American Company Must Reemploy Great American Service Members
No. 13035 Another New and Favorable USERRA Case
No. 13036 Misconduct Leads to Mistrial
No. 13037 The Limit on Duration of Service only Includes Service after Starting the Relevant Job
No. 13042 ROA Member Files Two USERRA Lawsuits
No. 13045 One Year of Back Pay Is not Enough
No. 13054 Not All USERRA Plaintiffs Are Successful
No. 13056 California University of Pennsylvania Sued for Violating USERRA
No. 13058 Time off from Civilian Job for Travel and Rest in Connection with Drill Weekend
No. 13061 Right to Health Insurance Reinstatement when Returning to Work after Military Service
No. 13064 Be Always Ready To Sue and Don’t Sleep on your Rights
No. 13066 Sometimes the Important Dog Is the One Who Does not Bark
No. 13073 Enforcing USERRA against a State Government Employer-Good News from Wisconsin
No. 13074 Once You File with DOL-Vets, You Are Stuck with Them for Awhile
No. 13075 You Can Sue a Political Subdivision in Federal Court under USERRA
No. 13075-Update2: You Can Sue a Political Subdivision in Federal Court under USERRA
No. 13075-Update3: You Can Sue a Political Subdivision in Federal Court under USERRA
No. 13076 Public Employee Promotion Exam while Mobilized
No. 13077 The Escalator Can Descend
No. 13081 DOJ Sues Cook County for Violating USERRA Pension Rights of Army Reserve Nurse
No. 13082 Escalator Principle Not Limited to Automatic Promotions—District of Puerto Rico Gets it Wrong
No. 13083 Don’t Tell your Civilian Employer that you Are Considering Enlistment
No. 13084 DOJ Sues Flight Safety Services Corporation to Enforce USERRA Pension Rights of Two Air Force Reservists
No. 13085 Federal Employees Are Protected from the Descending Escalator
No. 13087 Do I Accrue Civilian Vacation while I Am away from my Civilian Job for Military Service?
No. 13090 DOJ and NYPD Settle USERRA Class Action Lawsuit
No. 13091 Political Subdivisions of States Do Not Have 11th Amendment Immunity
No. 13092 Time off from Civilian Job for VA Medical Appointments—Good News from Louisiana
No. 13094 Please Don’t Supplant USERRA
No. 13095 Another USERRA Case Headed for Supreme Court
No. 13097 What Is a “Title 38 Employee?”
No. 13098 Interesting MSPB Case on USERRA
No. 13099 This Is Not your Father’s National Guard
No. 13104 How Do I Judge a USERRA Settlement Offer?
No. 13106 How Not To Treat a National Guard Member Who is Your Employee
No. 13108 Revising USERRA to Include Non-Pecuniary Compensatory Damages as Remedies
No. 13110 Special Protection against Discharge, Except for Cause, After Returning from Military Service
No. 13113 Pension Credit with State-Local Governments for Pre-1974 Military Service
No. 13118 Paid Military Leave for Military Retiree Who Returns to Active Duty
No. 13124 Beware the Judgement-Proof Defendant
No. 13126 Sometimes DOL-VETS Is Not Totally Worthless
No. 13127 First Circuit Reemphasizes Broad Scope of the Escalator Principle
No. 13131 DOJ Files USERRA Lawsuit against Delaware Employer
No. 13145 Important New USERRA Case in Fifth Circuit
No. 13147 OSC Effectiveness in Enforcing USERRA against Federal Agencies as Employers
No. 13156 Counties and Other Political Subdivisions are not Immune – Western District of Virginia gets it Wrong
No. 13160 Significant Development Regarding Differential Pay for Federal Employees Mobilized Under “Voluntary” Authority
No. 14003 Enforcing USERRA against the State of Missouri
No. 14002 Ethan Allen is still Rolling over in his Grave
No. 14004 Sergeant Major Erickson’s Saga Continues
No. 14016 Class Action USERRA Lawsuit against American Airlines Concerning Insufficient Pension Contributions for Pilots Returning to Work after extended Military Leave
No. 14017 Statute of Limitations and the NYPD Class Action USERRA Laws
No. 14028 I Volunteered for Active Duty—Am I Elligible for Differential Pay as a Federal Civilian?
No. 14029 DOJ Sues Missouri Adjutant General under USERRA
No. 14031 Veterans’ Preference for State Employees in Washington
No. 14032 New USERRA Case from the 8th Circuit
No. 14037 A Political Subdivision is not a State for 11th Amendment Purposes
No. 14036 Setback in Effort to Enforce USERRA against States as Employers
No. 14035 Is my Case Governed by VEVRAA or USERRA?
No. 14041 New Legislation in New Mexico for Service Members
No. 14046 Marine Corps Reservist Sues Village of Skokie for Violating USERRA
No. 14047 State and Local Government Employees Need Effective USERRA Protections
No. 14049 USERRA and State Sovereign—Good News from Tennessee
No. 14072 Don’t Quit your Job if you Want to Sue under USERRA
No. 14076 DOJ Sues Adjutant General of Missouri for Violating USERRA and Survives Motion to Dismiss
No. 15035 USERRA’s Five-Year Limit and the Initial Period of Obligated Service
No. 15036 Time off from Work for Short Periods of National Guard Training
No. 15041 Seniority for PHS Officers within the BOP Medical System
No. 15050 Reemployment Rights as an ANG Technician
No. 15054 You Must Apply for Reemployment—Part 6
No. 15055 You Must Apply for Reemployment—Part 7
No. 15057 Returning to Police Officer Job with PTSD
No. 15062 Update on Angiuoni v. Town of Billerica
No. 15063 New Favorable Case on Section 4311 of USERRA
No. 15064 The MSPB Adjudicates Claims that Federal Executive Agencies Have Violated USERRA
No. 15073 Recent Favorable USERRA Case from Massachusetts
No. 15080 New NLRB Decision Points the Way to Stronger USERRA Enforcement
No. 15086 Sixth Circuit Reverses Unfavorable District Court USERRA Decision
No. 15087 Seventh Circuit Reverses Unfavorable District Court USERRA Decision
No. 15088 Does USERRA Provide for the Recovery of Nonpecuniary and Punitive Damages?
No. 15089 Proposals to Improve USERRA No. 15094 Unfavorable Sixth Circuit USERRA Case
No. 15097 As an Employer, New York City Mistreats Marine Corps Reserve Officer
No. 15098 SSGT Baldo Bello’s USERRA Lawsuit against the Village of Skokie
No. 15099 Under USERRA, the Employer Can Be Required To Pay the Prevailing Service Member’s Attorney Fees and Costs, but under no Circumstances Can the Service Member Be Required To Pay the Employer’s Fees and Costs
No. 15101 Location Is an Aspect of Status
No. 15103 Coast Guard Reservist Alleges USERRA Violations by Drug Enforcement Administration
No. 15104 Navy Reservist Survives Employer’s Motion for Summary Judgment but then Loses Jury Trial
No. 15105 Army Reservist Survives Summary Judgment in Section 4311 Case
No. 15106 Section 4311 of USERRA
No. 15107 Section 4311 of USERRA Protects Veterans as well as Currently Serving Reserve Component Members
No. 15112 Which Employers Are Exempt from USERRA Enforcement?
No. 16002 Interesting USERRA Discrimination Case
No. 16003 Section 4311 of USERRA Protects HR Professionals who Oppose USERRA Violations
No. 16005 Don’t Burn the Bridge back to your Pre-Service Job
No. 16008 Bello v. Village of Skokie—Continued
No. 16009 USERRA Rights of Wounded National Guard Technician
No. 16012 Enforcing USERRA against a Federal Agency
No. 16013 Recent Favorable Federal Circuit USERRA Decision
No. 16014 Another Recent Federal Sector USERRA Victory
No. 16018 Favorable Appellate Decision on Section 4311 of USERRA
No. 16031 Sergeant Kelly Hance’s USERRA Saga Continues
No. 16032 April 2016 Important New USERRA Pension Case
No. 16033 Don’t Let the AFGE Override the USERRA Rights of PHS Officers Assigned to BOP
No. 16034 Enforcing USERRA against State Government Employers—Good News from New Mexico
No. 16035 USERRA Applies to Local Government
No. 16047 Maryland Law Adds Two Critical Protections For Veterans
No. 16050 DOJ Wins USERRA Case
No. 16052 New Attempt to Preclude Forced Arbitration in USERRA Cases
No. 16054 Retroactive Pay Increase and Section 4318 of USERRA
No. 16055 Department of the Army Flouts USERRA
No. 16059 Discrimination, Harassment, Spoliation, and USERRA
No. 16060 FedEx Violated USERRA in the Computation of a Bonus
No. 16062 Waiver Provisions in the SCRA and USERRA
No. 16064 The Air Force Must Comply with USERRA
No. 16073 Don’t Tell your Civilian Employer that you Are Trying to Enlist
No. 16074 A New Case on USERRA and Forced Arbitration
No. 16077 USERRA Gives you the Right to Time off from your Federal Civilian Job for Inactive Duty Training on a Weekday
No. 16094 New USERRA Lawsuit Filed against UAL over Pension Contributions, Sick Time Accrual, and Vacation Accrual
No. 16095 USERRA, the SCRA, and Statutes of Limitation
No. 16099 The Client Is Responsible for Court Costs as Incurred
No. 16101 USERRA in the Virginia Supreme Court
No. 16106 How Does Section 4318 of USERRA Apply to the Regular Military Retiree who Leaves a Federal Civilian Job To Return to Active Duty, Completes a Period of Voluntary Active Duty, Returns to Federal Civilian Employment, and then Retires?
No. 16109 OSC Takes Action To Protect VA Whistleblower
No. 16110 Ninth Circuit Holds that USERRA Does Not Preclude Forced Arbitration
No. 16113 Reflections on 40 Years as a Lawyer
No. 16115 DOJ Announces New Effort To Enforce USERRA and SCRA
No. 16120 Amendments Proposed To Improve USERRA Enforcement
No. 16122 My Employer Fired me when I Was on the way out the Door
No. 16123 In a USERRA Case, the Veteran Plaintiff Cannot Be Required To Pay the Defendant’s Court Costs
No. 16124 Bad News from Virginia on Enforcing USERRA against State Agencies as Employers
No. 16126 Great New Third Circuit USERRA Precedent
No. 17009 If you Are Claiming that the Firing Violates USERRA, you Can Appeal to the MSPB even if you Are a New Federal Employee
No. 17010 USERRA Entitles You to Return to a Position of like Status
No. 17013 Because of NDAA 2017, National Guard Technicians No Longer Receive Paid Military Leave under 5 U.S.C. 6323 while on AGR Duty
No. 17016 Proving a Violation of Section 4311 of USERRA: A Case Study
No. 17017 Case Study in Proving a Violation of Section 4311 of USERRA
No. 17022 USERRA and the Tax Bump
No. 17023 Pro Bono Attorney Does Great Job for USERRA Claimant
No. 17030 Is a National Guard Member on Active Duty Eligible To Vote in an NLRB Union Representation Election at her Civilian Workplace?
No. 17032 Enforcing USERRA against State Government Employers
No. 17033 Can You Sue the State of Tennessee for Violating USERRA?
No. 17035 USERRA Rights of Airline Pilot Injured while on Active Duty
No. 17040 With only one Remaining Member, the MSPB is Constrained
No. 17044 USERRA Precludes Employer-Initiated Lawsuits
No. 17045 Who Is the Named Plaintiff in a USERRA Lawsuit Initiated by DOJ?
No. 17047 Important New USERRA Case from the 6th Circuit
No. 17048 Important New USERRA Case from the 6th Circuit—Part 2
No. 17049 DC Government Is Treated as a State for USERRA Purposes
No. 17052 The State of Washington Pays out $13 Million for Violating USERRA and Washington’s Veterans’ Preference Law
No. 17054 USERRA and Arbitration—Good News from Nebraska
No. 17056 USERRA Does Not Permit a Declaratory Judgment Suit Initiated by the Employer
No. 17066 NELA Advocates for USERRA Improvements
No. 17069 ROA Testifies in Favor of Bill To Preclude Binding Arbitration of USERRA Disputes
No. 17071 ROA Members File Class Action Lawsuit against Southwest Airlines
No. 17073 New Case about USERRA and Disabled Veterans
No. 17074 Recent Case on Section 4311 of USERRA
No. 17075 Recent 5th Circuit Case on Rights of Reservist after Returning from Drill Weekend
No. 17076 USERRA and Federal Employees
No. 17079 New Jersey’s Law against Discrimination Protects Service Members and Veterans
No. 17081 DOJ Sues City of Glendale for Violating USERRA
No. 17082 Differential Pay for Federal Employees Voluntarily on Active Duty as National Guard or Reserve Service Members
No. 17084 An Instructive USERRA Case from the Central District of California
No. 17086 Enforcing USERRA against a State Government Employer—Continued

1.4 USERRA Enforcement

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Who We Are

Get in Touch

Local Number

Toll Free Number

Address