DONATE
JOIN

X

DONATE
JOIN

1.1.1.6 Foreign Employers in United States

Feb 19, 2026

  • No. 012 Enforcement of USERRA Rights
  • No. 024 Enforcement of Reemployment Rights Outside the U.S.
  • No. 061 Not Necessary To Establish Discriminatory Intent Under Section 4312
  • No. 065 Letter to Department of Justice Regarding USERRA
  • No. 065 Response DoJ Response to ROA letter Regarding USERRA
  • No. 067 Enforcement of USERRA Against Executive Agencies
  • No. 089 Enforcing USERRA Against A State
  • No. 089 Clarification
  • No. 093 USERRA Enforcement by OSC (Continued)
  • No. 108 Letter to Federal Agency Concerning USERRA Case Involving an Agency Employee
  • No. 115 Can the Employer Sue Me Under USERRA?
  • No. 148 Good News on USERRA Enforcement
  • No. 159 Waiving the Fee for Filing a USERRA Appeal
  • No. 163 USERRA Applies to State Department Non-Appropriated Fund Instrumentality at Embassy
  • No. 172 USERRA Has Teeth
  • No. 189 Appellate Review of MSPB Decisions on USERRA
  • No. 191 Sometimes David Does Beat Goliath
  • No. 197 Tutorial on USERRA Procedures
  • No. 200 Is Injunctive Relief Available in a USERRA Case?
  • No. 200-Update: Is Injunctive Relief Available in a USERRA Case?
  • No. 205 Recent USERRA Victory
  • No. 206 Computation of Damages in a USERRA Case
  • No. 0605 Demonstration Project on USERRA Enforcement Within the Federal Government
  • No. 0606 Can I Request DOJ Assistance After I Run out of Money To Pay My Lawyer?
  • No. 0611 Does USERRA Provide for Interest on Back Pay Awards?
  • No. 0614 Trilogy of New Rulings Affects Federal Employees
  • No. 0623 GAO Reports on USERRA Enforcement
  • No. 0632 I Want To Sue the Boss Personally
  • No. 0637 Does USERRA Apply to TSA Screeners?
  • No. 0706 Joint Employer Doctrine Revisited
  • No. 0707 KIA and USERRA: A claim can survive the death of the plaintiff
  • No. 0713 Willful USERRA Violation: Judge Determines Company’s Denial of Wrongdoing Is Not Credible
  • No. 0717 You Must Make an Effort To Mitigate Your Damages
  • No. 0722 Federal Circuit Reverses the MSPB, Again
  • No. 0726 MSPB Reversed, Yet Again
  • No. 0727 Federal Government Considered “Model Employer” Under USERRA
  • No. 0729 Kirkendall-VEOA and Equitable Tolling of Claim
  • No. 0730 Are Schedule C Employees Protected by USERRA?
  • No. 0731 Another Recent Case on Burden of Proof in USERRA
  • No. 0733 City of Columbus Held Not Liable for Suicide of Returning Veteran
  • No. 0734 GAO Reports on USERRA Enforcement
  • No. 0737 Right to Trial by Jury under USERRA
  • No. 0745 Recent Ohio Supreme Court Case on USERRA Enforcement
  • No. 0747 Russell v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  • No. 0750 Target Hit: National Guard Member Wins USERRA Case Plus Tort Damages Under State Law
  • No. 0752 Habit Forming: Federal Circuit Reverses MSPB Two More Times
  • No. 0753 A “Motivating Factor”: USERRA Case Reiterates That Military Duty Need Only Contribute To Termination Of Employment To Be A Violation Of Law
  • No. 0754 Firmer Teeth: Legislation Introduced to Enhance USERRA Enforcement
  • No. 0755 The Federal Case: A Description of USERRA’s Enforcement Mechanisms for Complaints by Federal Government Employees
  • No. 0758 Taking the Leap: Employer cover-up fools DOL, but not the jury
  • No. 0761 Veterans’ Preference Act requires a federal agency to waive maximum age rule.
  • No. 0763 The Office of Personnel Management Has Specific Responsibilities Under USERRA
  • No. 0810 Attempt To Expedite USERRA Enforcement Process
  • No. 0813 Despite Its Longtime Contention, AAFES Is NOT Exempt From USERRA
  • No. 0815 New Reporting Requirement for ESGR Cases
  • No. 0825 Hard Cases Make Bad Law
  • No. 0826 Hard Cases Make Bad Law-Continued
  • No. 0844 Vacation Days: A recent settlement casts a new light on vacation accrual for Reservists who take time off for military training or service
  • No. 0847 Proposed Servicemembers Access to Justice Act
  • No. 0847 Update: Proposed Servicemembers Access to Justice Act
  • No. 0848 Enforcing USERRA against a State—Part 2
  • No. 0849 Unlawful to Fire Army Recruit
  • No. 0852 Intelligence Not Superior: USERRA applies to Intelligence agencies
  • No. 0857 You Cannot Waive Your Reemployment Rights Until You Return from Service
  • No. 0858 Right to Jury Trial and Liquidated Damages Survives Death of the Unlawfully Fired Employee
  • No. 0860 Harassment Is a Cognizable Claim under USERRA
  • No. 09001 Non-Pecuniary Damages Available Under USERRA
  • No. 09001-Update Non-Pecuniary Damages Available Under USERRA
  • No. 09002 Naval Reservist Wins USERRA Case Against San Diego Police Department
  • No. 09004 How to Prove a USERRA Discrimination Case—Continued
  • No. 09006 When Long Service Equals No Promotion You Don’t Need a Smoking Gun to Win a Section 4311 Case Under USERRA
  • No. 09009 Another New Case on USERRA Discrimination
  • No. 09010 You Must Apply for Reemployment after You Leave Active Duty
  • No. 09012 DOJ Sues NC to Enforce USERRA Regarding a Magistrate Who Is a Reservist
  • No. 09012 Update: DOJ Sues NC to Enforce USERRA Regarding a Magistrate Who Is a Reservist
  • No. 09018 DOJ Sues Alabama DMHMR
  • No. 09022 Is Personal Animus Discrimination? A USERRA case may be headed to the Supreme Court.
  • No. 09022-Update Supreme Court Agrees To Review Unfavorable 7th Circuit Case
  • No. 09030 Justice Serves: DOJ sues Nevada and a Nevada corporation to enforce USERRA
  • No. 09031 DOJ Sues California Department of Corrections
  • No. 09034 Another Good Precedent on Reemployment Rights
  • No. 09036 Ethan Allen Is Rolling Over in his Grave
  • No. 09037 You Must Apply for Reemployment-Part 2
  • No. 09053 Joint Employment Doctrine Under USERRA-Continued
  • No. 09053-Update OSC Settles USERRA Case with DHS
  • No. 09056 Bugged: Be cautious about recording conversations with employers for use in USERRA cases
  • No. 09063 You Must Apply for Reemployment – Part 3
  • No. 10011 An Instructive New USERRA Case from Ohio
  • No. 10012 You Only Get One Chance To Make Your Case
  • No. 10014 11th Amendment Does Not Bar Suit against a State by the United States
  • No. 10015 Escalator Principle Applies to Entire Period of Military-Related Absence
  • No. 10017 DLA Violates USERRA
  • No. 10027 DOJ Sues Company and Settles the Same Day
  • No. 10026 Special Protection against Discharge, Except for Cause
  • No. 10031 DOJ Files and Settles on the Same Day, Again
  • *No. 10028 A Case Study of 38 U.S.C. Sections 4311 and 4312: Erickson v. United States Postal Service
  • No. 10029 You Can Sue a Political Subdivision Under USERRA
  • No. 10037 USERRA and Veterans’ Preference Laws Apply to California Court System
  • No. 10044 Federal Agency Employer Cannot Make You Quit the Reserves
  • No. 10046 USERRA Damages Can Be Awarded for Lost Military Pay
  • No. 10049 Injunctive Relief under USERRA
  • No. 10051 Alabama Ordered To Comply with USERRA
  • No. 10054 Don’t Do Your Reserve Work on Your Employer’s Time
  • No. 10066 USERRA Overrides Federal Agency Rule on “Outside Employment”
  • No. 10080 Congress Orders a New Demonstration Project on USERRA Enforcement
  • No. 10082 USERRA and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, Offer of Judgment: Awards of Plaintiff’s Attorney Fees and Prohibition of Charging Costs Under USERRA Are Not Affected by Rule 68.
  • No. 10087 USERRA Forbids Discrimination in Initial Employment
  • No. 11003 The MSPB Is Finally Catching On
  • No. 11006 Important New Case on USERRA Discrimination
  • No. 11010 USERRA Section 4302 Does Not Bar Settlement of USERRA Claim
  • No. 11011 DOJ Settles USERRA Suit Against Titan Laboratories
  • No. 11012 Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment for Employer
  • No. 11019 USERRA and Public Sector Pension Plans
  • No. 11028 Erickson v. United States Postal Service – Recent Implications to 38 U.S.C. 4311 & 4312
  • No. 11029 Tax Records in USERRA Cases: How Both Parties May Obtain Each Other’s Private Financial Records
  • No. 11030 Does USERRA Provide a Remedy for Employer Harassment?
  • No. 11034 Protection against Discharge after Reemployment
  • No. 11040 Suing a State Government Employer under USERRA
  • No. 11044 PTSD, USERRA, and the State of New Mexico
  • No. 11049 Another Case on State Sovereign Immunity under USERRA
  • No. 11052 DOL Closing Case as “Without Merit” Does Not Bind Claimant
  • No. 11058 Letter to DOJ about USERRA Enforcement
  • No. 11068 USERRA Protects the Co-Worker Who Testifies or Provides Information in a USERRA Case
  • No. 11067 Unfavorable 8th Circuit USERRA Case
  • No. 11073 Another Great USERRA Appellate Case
  • No. 11074 Why Does a Case Take so Long?
  • No. 11075 The National Guard Must Be a Model Employer under USERRA
  • No. 11080 It Is Not Your Responsibility to Find a Replacement
  • No. 11081 Does DOL Delay Count Against Me in Timeliness of My Lawsuit?
  • No. 11082 Does USERRA Apply to Me?
  • No. 11088 You Can Sue a City in Federal Court under USERRA
  • No. 11094 Matthew King’s Application for UCX Did Not Justify His Firing
  • No. 11095 USERRA and the State of New Mexico—Part 2
  • No. 11102 Bunting v. Town of Ocean City Comes to a Conclusion
  • No. 11111 Conflict Between National Guard Drill and Civilian Job
  • No. 12008 What Happens to My Stock Option Plan When I Get Mobilized?
  • No. 12010 Working at Your Civilian Job Prior to Reporting for Active Duty
  • No. 12011 Harassment as USERRA Violation
  • No. 12020 Reservists Should Be Permitted to Take Licensed Customs Broker Exams
  • No. 12024 Alternative Way to Enforce USERRA Against a State Government Employer
  • No. 12030 DOJ Sues UAL to Enforce USERRA Pension Rights of Air Guard Member
  • No. 12031 USERRA Plaintiff Does Not Have to Pay Filing Fee
  • No. 12032 Eleventh Circuit Affirms Judgment Against Alabama for Violating USERRA
  • No. 12033 Federal Arbitration Act Severely Limits Review of Arbitrator’s Erroneous Ruling
  • No. 12035 OPM Director Announces Zero Toleration for USERRA Violations
  • No. 12036 ESGR Serving 40 Years and Counting
  • No. 12040 DOJ Sues Home Depot for Violating USERRA
  • No. 12043 Senator Introduces Bill to Improve USERRA
  • No. 12047 Minnesota Passes Legislation on USERRA
  • No. 12049 NY Court: Calculations for Military and Regular Leave Benefits Not the Same
  • No. 12050 USERRA Applies to Short and Long Periods of Service
  • No. 12052 Contractual Statute of Limitations Under USERRA
  • No. 12055 A Small Sacrifice Asked of the 99.25%
  • No. 12061 DOJ Settles USERRA Suit Filed Against United Airlines
  • No. 12067 Is Harassment a Cognizable Claim under USERRA—(Continued)
  • No. 12069 DOJ Sues Commonwealth of PA to Enforce USERRA and Secures a Great Settlement
  • No. 12070 Civilian Pension Credit for Military Service Time before 1994
  • No. 12075 Sixth Circuit Holds that Nashville-Davidson County Willfully Violated USERRA and Must Pay Liquidated Damages
  • No. 12076 Presidential Memorandum Gives Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) Guidance to Federal Employers
  • No. 12082 DOJ Gets Job Back for Mobilized Navy Reservist
  • No. 12083 DOJ Files Class Action USERRA Lawsuit against NYC
  • No. 12086 TSA Screeners Now Finally Have Enforceable USERRA Rights
  • No. 12096 Army Cadet Command Implicitly Admits that it Violated USERRA in its Treatment of ROTC Employee Michael Hanke
  • No. 12099 There’s a Hole in USERRA. Will States Fill it if Congress Won’t?
  • No. 12102 Coast Guard Reservist Mobilized Soon After Hired for New Job
  • No. 12103 Pension Credit for 1980s Military Service
  • No. 12108 DOJ Sues NC School District on Behalf of Army Reservist
  • No. 12109 USERRA Forbids Discrimination with respect to Retention in Employment
  • No. 12115 Good News from Rhode Island on Enforcing USERRA against a State Agency as Employer
  • No. 12114 USERRA Does Not Apply to PHS Selection of PHS Officers
  • No. 12118 DOJ Sues NYC Internet Business for Violating USERRA
  • No. 12119 USERRA Forbids Discrimination in Employment Based on Uniformed Service—Not Limited to Reserve Component Service
  • No. 12120 Make the States Waive Sovereign Immunity Concerning USERRA Lawsuits or Lose Federal Funding—No, that Won’t Work
  • No. 12122 Does USERRA Violate the 10th Amendment?
  • No. 13004 USERRA Does Not Provide for Reemployment of Active Duty Service Member Who Starts Job while on Active Duty and Seeks Reemployment after a Deployment
  • No. 13021 Sergeant Major Erickson’s Struggle against the United States Postal Service Continues
  • No. 13022 The Escalator Can Descend as well as Ascend
  • No. 13025 The Escalator and the Sequester
  • No. 13027 ROA Files USERRA Amicus Brief in NM Appellate Court
  • No. 13028 DOJ Files Amicus Brief in NM Court of Appeals
  • No. 13029 Supreme Court Case Points Way to Effective Enforcement of USERRA against State Government Employers
  • No. 13031 State of Nevada Finally Complies with USERRA
  • No. 13032 A Great American Company Must Reemploy Great American Service Members
  • No. 13035 Another New and Favorable USERRA Case
  • No. 13036 Misconduct Leads to Mistrial
  • No. 13037 The Limit on Duration of Service only Includes Service after Starting the Relevant Job
  • No. 13042 ROA Member Files Two USERRA Lawsuits
  • No. 13045 One Year of Back Pay Is not Enough
  • No. 13054 Not All USERRA Plaintiffs Are Successful
  • No. 13056 California University of Pennsylvania Sued for Violating USERRA
  • No. 13058 Time off from Civilian Job for Travel and Rest in Connection with Drill Weekend
  • No. 13061 Right to Health Insurance Reinstatement when Returning to Work after Military Service
  • No. 13064 Be Always Ready To Sue and Don’t Sleep on your Rights
  • No. 13066 Sometimes the Important Dog Is the One Who Does not Bark
  • No. 13073 Enforcing USERRA against a State Government Employer-Good News from Wisconsin
  • No. 13074 Once You File with DOL-Vets, You Are Stuck with Them for Awhile
  • No. 13075 You Can Sue a Political Subdivision in Federal Court under USERRA
  • No. 13075-Update2: You Can Sue a Political Subdivision in Federal Court under USERRA
  • No. 13075-Update3: You Can Sue a Political Subdivision in Federal Court under USERRA
  • No. 13076 Public Employee Promotion Exam while Mobilized
  • No. 13077 The Escalator Can Descend
  • No. 13081 DOJ Sues Cook County for Violating USERRA Pension Rights of Army Reserve Nurse
  • No. 13082 Escalator Principle Not Limited to Automatic Promotions—District of Puerto Rico Gets it Wrong
  • No. 13083 Don’t Tell your Civilian Employer that you Are Considering Enlistment
  • No. 13084 DOJ Sues Flight Safety Services Corporation to Enforce USERRA Pension Rights of Two Air Force Reservists
  • No. 13085 Federal Employees Are Protected from the Descending Escalator
  • No. 13087 Do I Accrue Civilian Vacation while I Am away from my Civilian Job for Military Service?
  • No. 13090 DOJ and NYPD Settle USERRA Class Action Lawsuit
  • No. 13091 Political Subdivisions of States Do Not Have 11th Amendment Immunity
  • No. 13092 Time off from Civilian Job for VA Medical Appointments—Good News from Louisiana
  • No. 13094 Please Don’t Supplant USERRA
  • No. 13095 Another USERRA Case Headed for Supreme Court
  • No. 13097 What Is a “Title 38 Employee?”
  • No. 13098 Interesting MSPB Case on USERRA
  • No. 13099 This Is Not your Father’s National Guard
  • No. 13104 How Do I Judge a USERRA Settlement Offer?
  • No. 13106 How Not To Treat a National Guard Member Who is Your Employee
  • No. 13108 Revising USERRA to Include Non-Pecuniary Compensatory Damages as Remedies
  • No. 13110 Special Protection against Discharge, Except for Cause, After Returning from Military Service
  • No. 13113 Pension Credit with State-Local Governments for Pre-1974 Military Service
  • No. 13118 Paid Military Leave for Military Retiree Who Returns to Active Duty
  • No. 13124 Beware the Judgement-Proof Defendant
  • No. 13126 Sometimes DOL-VETS Is Not Totally Worthless
  • No. 13127 First Circuit Reemphasizes Broad Scope of the Escalator Principle
  • No. 13131 DOJ Files USERRA Lawsuit against Delaware Employer
  • No. 13145 Important New USERRA Case in Fifth Circuit
  • No. 13147 OSC Effectiveness in Enforcing USERRA against Federal Agencies as Employers
  • No. 13156 Counties and Other Political Subdivisions are not Immune – Western District of Virginia gets it Wrong
  • No. 13160 Significant Development Regarding Differential Pay for Federal Employees Mobilized Under “Voluntary” Authority
  • No. 14003 Enforcing USERRA against the State of Missouri
  • No. 14002 Ethan Allen is still Rolling over in his Grave
  • No. 14004 Sergeant Major Erickson’s Saga Continues
  • No. 14016 Class Action USERRA Lawsuit against American Airlines Concerning Insufficient Pension Contributions for Pilots Returning to Work after extended Military Leave
  • No. 14017 Statute of Limitations and the NYPD Class Action USERRA Laws
  • No. 14028 I Volunteered for Active Duty—Am I Elligible for Differential Pay as a Federal Civilian?
  • No. 14029 DOJ Sues Missouri Adjutant General under USERRA
  • No. 14031 Veterans’ Preference for State Employees in Washington
  • No. 14032 New USERRA Case from the 8th Circuit
  • No. 14037 A Political Subdivision is not a State for 11th Amendment Purposes
  • No. 14036 Setback in Effort to Enforce USERRA against States as Employers
  • No. 14035 Is my Case Governed by VEVRAA or USERRA?
  • No. 14041 New Legislation in New Mexico for Service Members
  • No. 14046 Marine Corps Reservist Sues Village of Skokie for Violating USERRA
  • No. 14047 State and Local Government Employees Need Effective USERRA Protections
  • No. 14049 USERRA and State Sovereign—Good News from Tennessee
  • No. 14072 Don’t Quit your Job if you Want to Sue under USERRA
  • No. 14076 DOJ Sues Adjutant General of Missouri for Violating USERRA and Survives Motion to Dismiss
  • No. 15035 USERRA’s Five-Year Limit and the Initial Period of Obligated Service
  • No. 15036 Time off from Work for Short Periods of National Guard Training
  • No. 15041 Seniority for PHS Officers within the BOP Medical System
  • No. 15050 Reemployment Rights as an ANG Technician
  • No. 15054 You Must Apply for Reemployment—Part 6
  • No. 15055 You Must Apply for Reemployment—Part 7
  • No. 15057 Returning to Police Officer Job with PTSD
  • No. 15062 Update on Angiuoni v. Town of Billerica
  • No. 15063 New Favorable Case on Section 4311 of USERRA
  • No. 15064 The MSPB Adjudicates Claims that Federal Executive Agencies Have Violated USERRA
  • No. 15073 Recent Favorable USERRA Case from Massachusetts
  • No. 15080 New NLRB Decision Points the Way to Stronger USERRA Enforcement
  • No. 15086 Sixth Circuit Reverses Unfavorable District Court USERRA Decision
  • No. 15087 Seventh Circuit Reverses Unfavorable District Court USERRA Decision
  • No. 15088 Does USERRA Provide for the Recovery of Nonpecuniary and Punitive Damages?
  • No. 15089 Proposals to Improve USERRA No. 15094 Unfavorable Sixth Circuit USERRA Case
  • No. 15097 As an Employer, New York City Mistreats Marine Corps Reserve Officer
  • No. 15098 SSGT Baldo Bello’s USERRA Lawsuit against the Village of Skokie
  • No. 15099 Under USERRA, the Employer Can Be Required To Pay the Prevailing Service Member’s Attorney Fees and Costs, but under no Circumstances Can the Service Member Be Required To Pay the Employer’s Fees and Costs
  • No. 15101 Location Is an Aspect of Status
  • No. 15103 Coast Guard Reservist Alleges USERRA Violations by Drug Enforcement Administration
  • No. 15104 Navy Reservist Survives Employer’s Motion for Summary Judgment but then Loses Jury Trial
  • No. 15105 Army Reservist Survives Summary Judgment in Section 4311 Case
  • No. 15106 Section 4311 of USERRA
  • No. 15107 Section 4311 of USERRA Protects Veterans as well as Currently Serving Reserve Component Members
  • No. 15112 Which Employers Are Exempt from USERRA Enforcement?
  • No. 16002 Interesting USERRA Discrimination Case
  • No. 16003 Section 4311 of USERRA Protects HR Professionals who Oppose USERRA Violations
  • No. 16005 Don’t Burn the Bridge back to your Pre-Service Job
  • No. 16008 Bello v. Village of Skokie—Continued
  • No. 16009 USERRA Rights of Wounded National Guard Technician
  • No. 16012 Enforcing USERRA against a Federal Agency
  • No. 16013 Recent Favorable Federal Circuit USERRA Decision
  • No. 16014 Another Recent Federal Sector USERRA Victory
  • No. 16018 Favorable Appellate Decision on Section 4311 of USERRA
  • No. 16031 Sergeant Kelly Hance’s USERRA Saga Continues
  • No. 16032 April 2016 Important New USERRA Pension Case
  • No. 16033 Don’t Let the AFGE Override the USERRA Rights of PHS Officers Assigned to BOP
  • No. 16034 Enforcing USERRA against State Government Employers—Good News from New Mexico
  • No. 16035 USERRA Applies to Local Government
  • No. 16047 Maryland Law Adds Two Critical Protections For Veterans
  • No. 16050 DOJ Wins USERRA Case
  • No. 16052 New Attempt to Preclude Forced Arbitration in USERRA Cases
  • No. 16054 Retroactive Pay Increase and Section 4318 of USERRA
  • No. 16055 Department of the Army Flouts USERRA
  • No. 16059 Discrimination, Harassment, Spoliation, and USERRA
  • No. 16060 FedEx Violated USERRA in the Computation of a Bonus
  • No. 16062 Waiver Provisions in the SCRA and USERRA
  • No. 16064 The Air Force Must Comply with USERRA
  • No. 16073 Don’t Tell your Civilian Employer that you Are Trying to Enlist
  • No. 16074 A New Case on USERRA and Forced Arbitration
  • No. 16077 USERRA Gives you the Right to Time off from your Federal Civilian Job for Inactive Duty Training on a Weekday
  • No. 16094 New USERRA Lawsuit Filed against UAL over Pension Contributions, Sick Time Accrual, and Vacation Accrual
  • No. 16095 USERRA, the SCRA, and Statutes of Limitation
  • No. 16099 The Client Is Responsible for Court Costs as Incurred
  • No. 16101 USERRA in the Virginia Supreme Court
  • No. 16106 How Does Section 4318 of USERRA Apply to the Regular Military Retiree who Leaves a Federal Civilian Job To Return to Active Duty, Completes a Period of Voluntary Active Duty, Returns to Federal Civilian Employment, and then Retires?
  • No. 16109 OSC Takes Action To Protect VA Whistleblower
  • No. 16110 Ninth Circuit Holds that USERRA Does Not Preclude Forced Arbitration
  • No. 16113 Reflections on 40 Years as a Lawyer
  • No. 16115 DOJ Announces New Effort To Enforce USERRA and SCRA
  • No. 16120 Amendments Proposed To Improve USERRA Enforcement
  • No. 16122 My Employer Fired me when I Was on the way out the Door
  • No. 16123 In a USERRA Case, the Veteran Plaintiff Cannot Be Required To Pay the Defendant’s Court Costs
  • No. 16124 Bad News from Virginia on Enforcing USERRA against State Agencies as Employers
  • No. 16126 Great New Third Circuit USERRA Precedent
  • No. 17009 If you Are Claiming that the Firing Violates USERRA, you Can Appeal to the MSPB even if you Are a New Federal Employee
  • No. 17010 USERRA Entitles You to Return to a Position of like Status
  • No. 17013 Because of NDAA 2017, National Guard Technicians No Longer Receive Paid Military Leave under 5 U.S.C. 6323 while on AGR Duty
  • No. 17016 Proving a Violation of Section 4311 of USERRA: A Case Study
  • No. 17017 Case Study in Proving a Violation of Section 4311 of USERRA
  • No. 17022 USERRA and the Tax Bump
  • No. 17023 Pro Bono Attorney Does Great Job for USERRA Claimant
  • No. 17030 Is a National Guard Member on Active Duty Eligible To Vote in an NLRB Union Representation Election at her Civilian Workplace?
  • No. 17032 Enforcing USERRA against State Government Employers
  • No. 17033 Can You Sue the State of Tennessee for Violating USERRA?
  • No. 17035 USERRA Rights of Airline Pilot Injured while on Active Duty
  • No. 17040 With only one Remaining Member, the MSPB is Constrained
  • No. 17044 USERRA Precludes Employer-Initiated Lawsuits
  • No. 17045 Who Is the Named Plaintiff in a USERRA Lawsuit Initiated by DOJ?
  • No. 17047 Important New USERRA Case from the 6th Circuit
  • No. 17048 Important New USERRA Case from the 6th Circuit—Part 2
  • No. 17049 DC Government Is Treated as a State for USERRA Purposes
  • No. 17052 The State of Washington Pays out $13 Million for Violating USERRA and Washington’s Veterans’ Preference Law
  • No. 17054 USERRA and Arbitration—Good News from Nebraska
  • No. 17056 USERRA Does Not Permit a Declaratory Judgment Suit Initiated by the Employer
  • No. 17066 NELA Advocates for USERRA Improvements
  • No. 17069 ROA Testifies in Favor of Bill To Preclude Binding Arbitration of USERRA Disputes
  • No. 17071 ROA Members File Class Action Lawsuit against Southwest Airlines
  • No. 17073 New Case about USERRA and Disabled Veterans
  • No. 17074 Recent Case on Section 4311 of USERRA
  • No. 17075 Recent 5th Circuit Case on Rights of Reservist after Returning from Drill Weekend
  • No. 17076 USERRA and Federal Employees
  • No. 17079 New Jersey’s Law against Discrimination Protects Service Members and Veterans
  • No. 17081 DOJ Sues City of Glendale for Violating USERRA
  • No. 17082 Differential Pay for Federal Employees Voluntarily on Active Duty as National Guard or Reserve Service Members
  • No. 17084 An Instructive USERRA Case from the Central District of California
  • No. 17086 Enforcing USERRA against a State Government Employer—Continued
  • No. 17096 Location Is an Aspect of Status
  • No. 17098 The No FEAR Act Does Not Apply to Discrimination against Reserve Component Service Members
  • No. 17101 Relationship between USERRA and other Federal, State, and Local Laws and Ordinances
  • No. 17106 Firing you Probably Violated USERRA
  • No. 17107 Don’t File an EEO Complaint for a USERRA Violation
  • No. 17109 Great New USERRA Victory in the 9th Circuit
  • No. 17114 The MSPB Has Ground to a Halt
  • No. 17115 Enforcing USERRA against a State—Good News from Texas
  • No. 17116 Enforcing USERRA against the State of Minnesota
  • No. 17117 The Territorial Government of the United States Virgin Islands Does Not Have Sovereign Immunity with respect to USERRA Lawsuits
  • No. 18011 Section 4303(1) of USERRA , Definition of “Attorney General”
  • No. 18013 Does USERRA Forbid Employer Harassment of Employees because of their Reserve Component Service? Congress Amends the Definition of “Benefit of Employment” To Clarify that the Answer Is Yes.
  • No. 18014 Escalator Principle Applies to Army Physician
  • No. 18015 Enforcing USERRA against a State Government Employer – Good News from California
  • No. 18017 Mr. President-Please Make Appointments for the MSPB Vacancies
  • No. 18118 If You Are Claiming a USERRA Violation, the MSPB Has Jurisdiction To Review Your Firing even if You Have Not Completed the Initial Year of Federal Employment
  • No. 18019 Section 4303(3) of USERRA: “Employee” Defined
  • No. 18025 OSC Acts To Enforce USERRA against the USPS
  • No. 18027 The USPS Is a “Federal Executive Agency” for Purposes of USERRA
  • No. 18031 I Think that I Am Entitled to Reemployment under State Law although I Will Be beyond USERRA’s Five-Year Limit
  • No. 18039 You Don’t Have To Be a Perfect Soldier To Get your Job Back
  • No. 18040 No Reemployment for Army Deserter
  • No. 18042 Coast Guard Reservist Loses USERRA Case at MSPB and Federal Circuit
  • No. 18045 Jones v. Marriott Revisited
  • No. 18047 Sections 4314 and 4315 of USERRA-OPM’s Responsibilities under USERRA
  • No. 18050 Does USERRA Have a Statute of Limitations?
  • No. 18052 A Federal Agency Cannot Make You Quit the Reserves—Part 2
  • No. 18055 You Must Track your own Five-Year Limit—Part 2
  • No. 18058 Instructive New USERRA Case
  • No. 18059 Beware of Asserting Inconsistent Claims—Part 2
  • No. 18060 Employers who Violate USERRA Willfully Should Have To Pay a Substantial Penalty
  • No. 18061 DOL-VETS Has Subpoena Power for USERRA Investigations
  • No. 18064 Congress Amended USERRA To Put Deadlines on DOL, DOJ, and OSC
  • No. 18065 DOL, DOJ, and OSC Required To Report on USERRA
  • No. 18066 America Will Be the Land of the Free only so long as it Remains the Home of the Brave
  • No. 18067 You Have a Duty To Mitigate your Damages
  • No. 18068 Is it too Late To Sue Blockbuster?
  • No. 18070 Can I Sue the Commonwealth of Kentucky For Violating my USERRA Rights?
  • No. 18071 Is it Lawful for me To Record my Employer Ranting and Raving about his Hostility to my USAR Service?
  • No. 18076 Army Reservist Prevails in Important USERRA Case
  • No. 18077 Can I Sue my State Government Employer for Violating my USERRA Rights?
  • No. 18078 Smith v. Tennessee National Guard—The Long Waste of Time Finally Comes to an End
  • No. 18080 Recent USERRA Case—Summary Judgment Denied
  • No. 18081 The Returning Veteran Who Meets the USERRA Conditions Is Entitled to Pay Raises that he or she Would Have Received with Reasonable Certainty, but for the Call to the Colors
  • No. 18083 Another Interesting Recent USERRA Case
  • No. 18084 Understand and then Insist upon your USERRA Right
  • No. 18085 Medical Appointments for Service-Connected Disability Do Not Amount to “Service in the Uniformed Services” for Purposes of USERRA
  • No. 18086 USERRA Does Not Require an Employer To Accommodate the Military Service of the Spouse of an Employee
  • No. 18087 Reservist Wins USERRA Case against Gojet Airlines
  • No. 18089 Navy Reservist Sues Employer for Violating USERRA and Survives Employer’s Motion for Summary Judgment
  • No. 18090 Another Important New USERRA Case
  • No. 18096 Logjam at MSPB Continues
  • No. 18097 Am I Eligible for the Extra 22 Days of Paid Military Leave as a Federal Civilian Employee?
  • No. 18101 Extra 22 Days of Paid Military Leave for RC Members on Active Duty in Support of Contingency Operations
  • No. 18106 Make-up Promotion Exam for Reservist on Active Duty and away from his or her Police Officer Job
  • No. 18108 AFTPs in the Army as well as the Air Force and for Enlisted Crew Members as well as Pilot Officers
  • No. 18111 Right to Reemployment in a Term-Limited Federal Job
  • No. 18113 Enforcing USERRA against a State Government Employer—Bad News from Texas
  • No. 19003 In a Lawsuit, you Don’t Get a Mulligan
  • No. 19015 Applying USERRA to the National Guard Technician
  • No. 19026 New Lawsuit against Southwest Airlines for Violating USERRA
  • No. 19029 Employer Must Make Prompt Payments to Employee’s Retirement Account after Employee Returns from Military Service
  • No. 19033 USERRA Precludes Employer-Initiated Lawsuits
  • No. 19034 Am I Required To Exhaust Remedies through the Union Agreement before I Sue my Employer For Violating USERRA? No
  • No. 19035 Forced Arbitration of USERRA Disputes
  • No. 19036 Forced Arbitration-I Regret that I Did Not Know then (1991) What I Know Now (2019)
  • No. 19038 Actively Participating Reserve Component Members Sue L-3 Communications for Hiring Discrimination and Case Settles
  • No. 19039 Congratulations to DOL and DOJ for Successfully Resolving a USERRA Violation by a Small Business in Virginia
  • No. 19040 How Do I Get Free DOJ Representation for my USERRA Claim?
  • No. 19041 Enforcing USERRA against a Federal Agency Employer
  • No. 19044 New USERRA Class Action Lawsuit against American Airlines
  • No. 19047 DOJ Sues the Warren County Board of Education again
  • No. 19051 The Federal Circuit Reverses the MSPB yet again
  • No. 19054 National Guard Technicians Who Are away from Technician Jobs for Title 10 Active Duty Are Entitled to 15 Days per Year of Paid Military Leave under 5 U.S.C. 6323
  • No. 19056 USERRA Coverage of National Guard Personnel
  • No. 19069 Federal Employee away from Work for Uniformed Service Is Entitled to Step Increase upon Reemployment, Not during Service
  • No. 19075 You Can Have the Right to Reemployment in more than one Job
  • No. 19080 Apply for Reemployment when you Return from Military Service although the Employer Purportedly Fired you on the way out the Door
  • No. 19083 USERRA Is a Floor and not a Ceiling
  • No. 19087 Do I Have To Work on my Day Off? Part Two
  • No. 19088 Veterans Preference Under Washington Initiative 1000
  • No. 19089 DOJ Sues Coahoma County Sheriff for Flouting USERRA
  • No. 19090 Court Can Use its Equity Powers To Enforce USERRA
  • No. 19091 Your County Government Employer Does Not Have Sovereign Immunity under the 11th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
  • No. 19092 Under USERRA, You Are Entitled to Imputed Earnings during The Time You Were Away from Work for Service
  • No. 19093 USERRA Lawsuit against SWA Is Settled
  • No. 19094 ROA Member Honored for Representing Service Members with USERRA Claims
  • No. 19097 Important 2018 Supreme Court Case on SEC ALJs—What Does it Mean for MSPB AJs?
  • No. 19098 Logjam at the MSPB—When Will it ever End?
  • No. 19101 DOJ Sues Walmart for Violating USERRA
  • No. 19103 Sorry, but I Don’t Have a Magic Wand
  • No. 19104 Recent Favorable Appellate Court Decision on USERRA
  • No. 19107 Seventh Circuit Reverses the Northern District of Illinois in a USERRA Case
  • No. 19112 Another Favorable Appellate Case on Section 4311 of USERRA
  • No. 20002 Favorable USERRA Decision by the 8th Circuit—Part 1
  • No. 20004 Favorable USERRA Decision by the 8th Circuit—Part 3 The Army and the National Guard Should Help the Wounded Warrior To Secure his or her USERRA Rights
  • No. 20005 Favorable USERRA Decision by the 8th Circuit—Part 3 The Judicial Estoppel Issue
  • No. 20007 Important New USERRA Case—Part 1
  • No. 20008 Important New USERRA Case—Part 2
  • No. 20009 DOL-VETS Found in my Favor—Can my Attorney Get the DOL-VETS Report into Evidence?
  • No. 20026 Leave Active Duty and Apply for Reemployment and Return to Work To Obtain Civilian Pension Credit for the Period of Service
  • No. 20031 Sergeant Major Erickson’s Long Struggle with the USPS May Be Finally Coming to an End
  • No. 20032 Enforcement Procedure for Federal Employee USERRA Complaints
  • No. 20042 EEOC Flouts USERRA
  • No. 20049 USERRA Forbids Employer Harassment of Reserve Component Personnel
  • No. 20050 Location Is an Aspect of Status
  • No. 20052 Important New Case on the Furlough or Leave of Absence Clause
  • No. 20059 The USPS and USERRA
  • No. 20063 More on Successor in Interest and USERRA
  • No. 21004 More on Successor in Interest and USERRA
  • No. 21005 USERRA Does Not Provide for Punitive and Mental Anguish Damages
  • No. 21006 Am I Required To Participate in my Civilian Employer’s Investigation while I Am Deployed?
  • No. 21008 If DOL-VETS Is Doing Well, you Should Stick with them
  • No. 21013 There Need Not Be a Merger or Transfer of Assets for the New Employer To Be the Successor-in-Interest to the Old Employer
  • No. 21015 New USERRA Lawsuit by Jayson Huntsman
  • No. 21021 Veterans’ Preference in the Excepted Service
  • No. 21023 Neither the Fact that the Assignment Is OCONUS, Nor the “Temporary” Nature of the Assignment, Nor the Fact that the Contract Number Has Changed, Nor the Fact that the Job Has Been Filled Defeats your USERRA Rights.
  • No. 21024 Federal Employee Called to the Colors as RC Member Is Entitled to Continued Civilian Health Insurance Coverage for Free
  • No. 21025 Apply for Reemployment with the new Company as well as the Company you Were Working for before your Active Duty
  • No. 21027 Employers and Supervisors: Saying “Thank You for Your Service” Is Not Enough.
  • No. 21031 Pension Benefits for Employees Working through Hiring Halls whose Civilian Careers Are Interrupted by Military Service
  • No. 21035 Am I Required To Participate in my Civilian Employer’s Investigation while I Am Deployed?
  • No. 21042 New York Law Includes a Provision for your Situation
  • No. 21046 USERRA’s Furlough or Leave of Absence Clause Is Not Just for Airline Pilots.
  • No. 21053 DOL-VETS and DOJ Do well for Army Reservist
  • No. 21054 How Do I Get Free DOJ Representation for my USERRA Case?
  • No. 21056 USERRA Protects Inactive Duty Training and Active  Duty for Training for Retirement Points Only
  • No. 21064 DOJ Sues Guam for Violating USERRA
  • No. 21068 Firing the City Manager Violated USERRA.
  • No. 21070 It Is Unlawful for an Employer To Discriminate against those who Have Served in the Military regarding Civilian Pension Entitlements.
  • No. 21077 Paid Military Leave for Federal Employees
  • No. 21078 In Awarding Contracts for the Procurement of Goods or Services, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Must Award the Contracts to Small Businesses Owned and Operated by Service-Connected Disabled Veterans under some Circumstances.
  • No. 21080 Your Employer Violated USERRA Willfully, But under Current Law You Are Not Entitled to Monetary Damages. USERRA Needs To Be Amended.
  • No. 22013 Another New Case on USERRA Pension Benefits in a Multi-Employer Pension Plan
  • No. 22018 No Statute of Limitations Limits when you Can Initiate a USERRA Complaint.
  • No. 22032 Improve the Performance of DOL-VETS in Enforcing USERRA.
  • No. 22033 Computing Damages in a USERRA Case.
  • No. 22037 Depriving You of Paid Military Leave under 5 U.S.C. § 6323 Violates USERRA.
  • No. 22038 Good News: The MSPB Finally Has a Quorum.
  • No. 22043 U.S. Department of Justice Sues the State of Illinois and Obtains an Excellent Settlement the Next Day.
  • No. 22046 Good News from the Supreme Court about Enforcing USERA against State Government Employers
  • No. 22047 Please Do Not Fire the National Guard Technician While He Is on Active Duty.
  • No. 22048 Forced Arbitration of USERRA Disputes
  • No. 22052 A Federal Employee Has only 45 Days To File an EEO Complaint, But That Deadline Does Not Apply to USERRA Complaints
  • No. 22053 Joe Smith Has the Right to Reemployment at your Federal Agency, Despite his “Resignation” when he Left his Job to Enlist in the Army.
  • No. 22057 National Guard Technicians Are Not Entitled To Receive Paid Military Leave under 5 U.S.C. § 6323(a)(1) when they Are on AGR Duty. They Are Entitled to Paid Military Leave when they Are on other forms of Military Duty.
  • No. 22061 State Agencies Must Comply with USERRA.
  • No. 22072 If You, as an Individual, Are Suing a State Agency for Violating USERRA, You Must File the Suit in State Court. If DOJ Is Suing on Your Behalf, the Case Will Be Filed in Federal Court.
  • No. 23005 Brigadier General Michael J. Silva Won an Important, Precedent-Setting USERRA Case in 2009 Preserving USERRA Rights for Dual Employees
  • No. 23008 USERRA Precludes Suits Initiated by Employers
  • No. 23011 Enforcing USERRA against a Private Employer
  • No. 23012 Enforcing USERRA against a Local Government
  • No. 23013 Enforcing USERRA against a State University or other State Agency
  • No. 23014 You Can Bring Closely Related State Law Claims along with your Federal USERRA Claim in your Federal Court Lawsuit
  • No. 23024 Enforcing USERRA against a Federal Agency Employer
  • No. 23026 We Are Now 3-0 in the Courts of Appeals on our Interpretation of USERRA’s Furlough or Leave of Absence Clause.
  • No. 23027 What Is a Prohibited Personnel Practice (PPP)? My Federal Supervisor Has Willfully Violated USERRA. Is that a PPP?
  • No. 23029 PHS Officers Are Protected by USERRA, But PHS Officers Are Not Entitled to Paid Military Leave under 5 U.S.C. § 6323.
  • No. 23030 The Wrong Way To Assert that your Employer Violated USERRA
  • No. 23032 Recent USERRA Decision in the Northern District of Illinois
  • No. 23034 Yes, USERRA Applies to “Temporary” Jobs.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *