DONATE
JOIN

X

DONATE
JOIN

1.2 USERRA—Discrimination Prohibited

Feb 19, 2026

  • No. 011 Discrimination Against Reservists
  • No. 035 Impending Service Results in Immediate Firing
  • No. 036 Activation Prevents Start of New Job
  • No. 064 Discrimination in Hiring
  • No. 106 Don’t Try to Work at your Civilian Job While on Active Duty
  • No. 122 May We Forbid Current Employees Permission To Join Reserves?
  • No. 128 New USERRA Case
  • No. 135 Employer Quotas Revisited
  • No. 150 Protection from Discrimination-Continued
  • No. 153 Make-Up Exam After Returning From Service
  • No. 162 Discrimination Against Recently Separated Veterans
  • No. 170 Missed Promotion Exam While Mobilized
  • No. 191 Sometimes David Does Beat Goliath
  • No. 198 Asking Questions About Reserve Affiliation in Employment Application Forms
  • No. 205 Recent USERRA Victory
  • No. 0609 USERRA’s Discrimination Applies Even To “Temporary” Positions of Employment
  • No. 0610 Where Do I Go for USERRA Assistance?
  • No. 0631 Is Harassment a Cognizable Claim Under USERRA?
  • No. 0702 What Are You Thinking?
  • No. 0731 Another Recent Case on Burden of Proof in USERRA
  • No. 0739 Burden of Proof in Section 4311 Cases
  • No. 0746 USERRA Forbids Discrimination in Initial Hiring
  • No. 0750 Target Hit:  National Guard Member Wins USERRA Case Plus Tort Damages Under State Law
  • No. 0753 A “Motivating Factor”: USERRA Case Reiterates That Military Duty Need Only Contribute To Termination Of Employment To Be A Violation Of Law
  • No. 0762 Airline Discourages Reserve Service With Contrary Paycheck, Insurance, and Leave Policies
  • No. 0765 Reservist Loses Job for Collecting Undeserved Benefits
  • No. 0807 Bonus Bust: Mobilization Deprives Soldier of Earned Bonus at Civilian Job
  • No. 0841 How NOT To Prove a Discrimination Case Under USERRA
  • No. 0849 Unlawful to Fire Army Recruit
  • No. 0855 Mobilized Reservist Should Not Miss Out on Promotion Opportunities
  • No. 0856 Unlawful for Airline To Deny You Free-Space-Available Travel to Your Drill—Right to Time Off for Travel to and from Your Drill Weekend
  • No. 0860 Harassment Is a Cognizable Claim under USERRA
  • No. 09002 Naval Reservist Wins USERRA Case Against San Diego Police Department
  • No. 09004 How to Prove a USERRA Discrimination Case—Continued
  • No. 09006 When Long Service Equals No Promotion You Don’t Need a Smoking Gun to Win a Section 4311 Case Under USERRA
  • No. 09009 Another New Case on USERRA Discrimination
  • No. 09012 DOJ Sues NC to Enforce USERRA Regarding a Magistrate Who Is a Reservist
  • No. 09012 Update: DOJ Sues NC to Enforce USERRA Regarding a Magistrate Who Is a Reservist
  • No. 09022 Is Personal Animus Discrimination? A USERRA case may be headed to the Supreme Court.
  • No. 09023 15th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Monroe v. Standard Oil Co. 452 U.S. 549 (1981)
  • No. 09026 Mobilized Reservists and the Chicago Fire Department
  • No. 09030 Justice Serves: DOJ sues Nevada and a Nevada corporation to enforce USERRA
  • No. 09036 Ethan Allen Is Rolling Over in his Grave
  • No. 09037 You Must Apply for Reemployment-Part 2
  • No. 09048 No Time Limit on Justice for the Returning Veteran—Part 2
  • No. 09052 Section 4311 of USERRA Is Not Limited to Reserve Components
  • No. 10004 Generous Employer Not Required to Remain Generous
  • No. 10011 An Instructive New USERRA Case from Ohio
  • No. 10012 You Only Get One Chance To Make Your Case
  • No. 10016 Army Command Violates USERRA with respect to Hiring Government Contractor Employees as Federal Employees
  • No. 10017 DLA Violates USERRA
  • No. 10019 The Cost to Employers: Call-ups of Citizen Warriors have hit small businesses hard, but a larger economic impact is at stake
  • No. 10027 DOJ Sues Company and Settles the Same Day
  • No. 10026 Special Protection against Discharge, Except for Cause
  • No. 10031 DOJ Files and Settles on the Same Day, Again
  • *No. 10028 A Case Study of 38 U.S.C. Sections 4311 and 4312: Erickson v. United States Postal Service
  • No. 10038 Proposed Legislation To Promote Hiring of Recent Veterans
  • No. 10054 Don’t Do Your Reserve Work on Your Employer’s Time
  • No. 10066 USERRA Overrides Federal Agency Rule on “Outside Employment”
  • No. 10067 My Big Bank Will Be Taken Over by Bigger Bank
  • No. 10076 Congress Strengthens USERRA’s Protection against Discrimination
  • No. 10087 USERRA Forbids Discrimination in Initial Employment
  • No. 11006 Important New Case on USERRA Discrimination
  • No. 11008 MSPB Holds that Disparate Impact Discrimination Is Not a Cognizable Claim under USERRA
  • No. 11009 USERRA Does Not Protect Absence from Work To Attend DEP Meetings
  • No. 11012 Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment for Employer
  • No. 11022 Supreme Court Reverses 7th Circuit in USERRA Case
  • No. 11026 Can We Fire Him for Going over the Five-Year Limit?
  • No. 11027 USERRA Prohibition Against Retaliation May Extend to Service Member’s Spouse Who Works for the Same Employer
  • No. 11028 Erickson v. United States Postal Service – Recent Implications to 38 U.S.C. 4311 & 4312
  • No. 11030 Does USERRA Provide a Remedy for Employer Harassment?
  • No. 11034 Protection against Discharge after Reemployment
  • No. 11041 Army Reserve Dentist Loses USERRA Case
  • No. 11043 New Evidence of Discrimination against Recently Separated Veterans
  • No. 11068 USERRA Protects the Co-Worker Who Testifies or Provides Information in a USERRA Case
  • No. 11067 Unfavorable 8th Circuit USERRA Case
  • No. 11073 Another Great USERRA Appellate Case
  • No. 11075 The National Guard Must Be a Model Employer under USERRA
  • No. 11080 It Is Not Your Responsibility to Find a Replacement
  • No. 11082 Does USERRA Apply to Me?
  • No. 11089 Veterans Opportunity to Work Act of 2011
  • No. 11095 USERRA and the State of New Mexico—Part 2
  • No. 11102 Bunting v. Town of Ocean City Comes to a Conclusion
  • No. 11105 Unemployment Rate Among Young Veterans Rises Even While Overall Rate Drops
  • No. 11110 As Civilian Employer, Army Harasses and Abuses Disabled Veteran
  • No. 12010 Working at Your Civilian Job Prior to Reporting for Active Duty
  • No. 12011 Harassment as USERRA Violation
  • No. 12015 USERRA’s Special Protection Period Against Discharge Upon Reemployment
  • No. 12020 Reservists Should Be Permitted to Take Licensed Customs Broker Exams
  • No. 12023 You Must Stay Within the Five-Year Limit to Have the Right to Reemployment
  • No. 12033 Federal Arbitration Act Severely Limits Review of Arbitrator’s Erroneous Ruling
  • No. 12034 Coast Guard Reservist Needs Drill Credit for Medical Appointment
  • No. 12040 DOJ Sues Home Depot for Violating USERRA
  • No. 12046 Should We Tell the Employers Now or Wait?
  • No. 12047 Minnesota Passes Legislation on USERRA
  • No. 12050 USERRA Applies to Short and Long Periods of Service
  • No. 12052 Contractual Statute of Limitations Under USERRA
  • No. 12067 Is Harassment a Cognizable Claim under USERRA—(Continued)
  • No. 12073 Minnesota Teacher Called to Active Duty—Was He Required to Finance his own Substitute?
  • No. 12075 Sixth Circuit Holds that Nashville-Davidson County Willfully Violated USERRA and Must Pay Liquidated Damages
  • No. 12082 DOJ Gets Job Back for Mobilized Navy Reservist
  • No. 12096 Army Cadet Command Implicitly Admits that it Violated USERRA in its Treatment of ROTC Employee Michael Hanke
  • No. 12099 There’s a Hole in USERRA. Will States Fill it if Congress Won’t?
  • No. 12102 Coast Guard Reservist Mobilized Soon After Hired for New Job
  • No. 12108 DOJ Sues NC School District on Behalf of Army Reservist
  • No. 12109 USERRA Forbids Discrimination with respect to Retention in Employment
  • No. 12114 USERRA Does Not Apply to PHS Selection of PHS Officers
  • No. 12118 DOJ Sues NYC Internet Business for Violating USERRA
  • No. 12119 USERRA Forbids Discrimination in Employment Based on Uniformed Service—Not Limited to Reserve Component Service
  • No. 13021 Sergeant Major Erickson’s Struggle against the United States Postal Service Continues
  • No. 13022 The Escalator Can Descend as well as Ascend
  • No. 13031 State of Nevada Finally Complies with USERRA
  • No. 13036 Misconduct Leads to Mistrial
  • No. 13041 USERRA Overrides Agreement You Signed when You Were Hired
  • No. 13042 ROA Member Files Two USERRA Lawsuits
  • No. 13045 One Year of Back Pay Is not Enough
  • No. 13056 California University of Pennsylvania Sued for Violating USERRA
  • No. 13057 Don’t Use your Employer’s Computer for Navy Reserve Work
  • No. 13058 Time off from Civilian Job for Travel and Rest in Connection with Drill Weekend
  • No. 13064 Be Always Ready  To Sue and Don’t Sleep on your Rights
  • No. 13066 Sometimes the Important Dog Is the One Who Does not Bark
  • No. 13073 Enforcing USERRA against a State Government Employer-Good News from Wisconsin
  • No. 13077 The Escalator Can Descend
  • No. 13083 Don’t Tell your Civilian Employer that you Are Considering Enlistment
  • No. 13091 Political Subdivisions of States Do Not Have 11th Amendment Immunity
  • No. 13094 Please Don’t Supplant USERRA
  • No. 13095 Another USERRA Case Headed for Supreme Court
  • No. 13097 What Is a “Title 38 Employee?”
  • No. 13098 Interesting MSPB Case on USERRA
  • No. 13099 This Is Not your Father’s National Guard
  • No. 13106 How Not To Treat a National Guard Member Who is Your Employee
  • No. 13108 Revising USERRA to Include Non-Pecuniary Compensatory Damages as Remedies
  • No. 13111 How to Compute One Year for Purposes of Section 4316(c) of USERRA
  • No. 13131 DOJ Files USERRA Lawsuit against Delaware Employer
  • No. 13144 The SCRA and USERRA – Protecting the Civil Rights of Service Members in the 21st Century
  • No. 13145 Important New USERRA Case in Fifth Circuit
  • No. 13156 Counties and Other Political Subdivisions are not Immune – Western District of Virginia gets it Wrong
  • No. 13166 Reserve Component Opportunities for Individuals Leaving Active Duty Short of Retirement Eligibility
  • No. 14003 Enforcing USERRA against the State of Missouri
  • No. 14002 Ethan Allen is still Rolling over in his Grave
  • No. 14004 Sergeant Major Erickson’s Saga Continues
  • No. 14024 The Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act and the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
  • No. 14029 DOJ Sues Missouri Adjutant General under USERRA
  • No. 14031 Veterans’ Preference for State Employees in Washington
  • No. 14032 New USERRA Case from the 8th Circuit
  • No. 14036 Setback in Effort to Enforce USERRA against States as Employers
  • No. 14046 Marine Corps Reservist Sues Village of Skokie for Violating USERRA
  • No. 14047 State and Local Government Employees Need Effective USERRA Protections
  • No. 14072 Don’t Quit your Job if you Want to Sue under USERRA
  • No. 14074 Right to Use Vacation Days for Military Service
  • No. 14076 DOJ Sues Adjutant General of Missouri for Violating USERRA and Survives Motion to Dismiss
  • No. 15016 Carter v. Siemens Update
  • No. 15036 Time off from Work for Short Periods of National Guard Training
  • No. 15041 Seniority for PHS Officers within the BOP Medical System
  • No. 15039 Federal Law Protects Students Called to the Colors during a Semester, But it Does not Help the Student who Must Miss a few Days for Drills or Annual Training
  • No. 15037 Reemployment Rights for Wounded Warriors
  • No. 15053 USERRA 101 Final Exam
  • No. 15057 Returning to Police Officer Job with PTSD
  • No. 15059 Does USERRA Provide for Disparate Impact Liability?
  • No. 15062 Update on Angiuoni v. Town of Billerica
  • No. 15063 New Favorable Case on Section 4311 of USERRA
  • No. 15064 The MSPB Adjudicates Claims that Federal Executive Agencies Have Violated USERRA
  • No. 15066 Calling you an Independent Contractor Does Not Make you one.
  • No. 15069 It Is Unlawful for an Employer To Deny Initial Employment Based on Unavailability on the Start Date, When the Unavailability Is Based on Active Military Service.
  • No. 15073 Recent Favorable USERRA Case from Massachusetts
  • No. 15075 USERRA Applies to Voluntary as well as Involuntary Military Service
  • No. 15086 Sixth Circuit Reverses Unfavorable District Court USERRA Decision
  • No. 15087 Seventh Circuit Reverses Unfavorable District Court USERRA Decision
  • No. 15089 Proposals to Improve USERRA
  • No. 15092 2015 New Jersey Military Law Symposium
  • No. 15094 Unfavorable Sixth Circuit USERRA Case
  • No. 15097 As an Employer, New York City Mistreats Marine Corps Reserve Officer
  • No. 15098 SSGT Baldo Bello’s USERRA Lawsuit against the Village of Skokie
  • No. 15100 The French Company Fired my Wife!
  • No. 15103 Coast Guard Reservist Alleges USERRA Violations by Drug Enforcement Administration
  • No. 15104 Navy Reservist Survives Employer’s Motion for Summary Judgment but then Loses Jury Trial
  • No. 15105 Army Reservist Survives Summary Judgment in Section 4311 Case
  • No. 15106 Section 4311 of USERRA
  • No. 15107 Section 4311 of USERRA Protects Veterans as well as Currently Serving Reserve Component Members
  • No. 15116 New USERRA Primer
  • No. 16002 Interesting USERRA Discrimination Case
  • No. 16003 Section 4311 of USERRA Protects HR Professionals who Oppose USERRA Violations
  • No. 16008 Bello v. Village of Skokie—Continued
  • No. 16012 Enforcing USERRA against a Federal Agency
  • No. 16013 Recent Favorable Federal Circuit USERRA Decision
  • No. 16014 Another Recent Federal Sector USERRA Victory
  • No. 16018 Favorable Appellate Decision on Section 4311 of USERRA
  • No. 16024 West Virginia Legislature Enacts Confusing New Law on Veterans’ Preference in Private Sector Employment
  • No. 16031 Sergeant Kelly Hance’s USERRA Saga Continues
  • No. 16033 Don’t Let the AFGE Override the USERRA Rights of PHS Officers Assigned to BOP
  • No. 16034 Enforcing USERRA against State Government Employers—Good News from New Mexico
  • No. 16035 USERRA Applies to Local Government
  • No. 16036 It Is Illegal for the Air Force To Discriminate against an Air Force Reservist in Hiring for a Civilian Position
  • No. 16039 Opportunity To Telecommute Is a Benefit of Employment Protected by USERRA
  • No. 16047 Maryland Law Adds Two Critical Protections For Veterans
  • No. 16050 DOJ Wins USERRA Case
  • No. 16055 Department of the Army Flouts USERRA
  • No. 16059 Discrimination, Harassment, Spoliation, and USERRA
  • No. 16064 The Air Force Must Comply with USERRA
  • No. 16069 USERRA Applies all over the World to American Corporations and Institutions
  • No. 16072 USERRA and the Career Intermission Program
  • No. 16073 Don’t Tell your Civilian Employer that you Are Trying to Enlist
  • No. 16074 A New Case on USERRA and Forced Arbitration
  • No. 16078 USERRA, the Escalator Principle, and the Lack of a Present Vacancy at the Appropriate Level
  • No. 16099 The Client Is Responsible for Court Costs as Incurred
  • No. 16100 Don’t Do Military Duty on a Sick Leave Day
  • No. 16105 The Posse Comitatus Act and the Activated Reservist
  • No. 16122 My Employer Fired me when I Was on the way out the Door
  • No. 16123 In a USERRA Case, the Veteran Plaintiff Cannot Be Required To Pay the Defendant’s Court Costs
  • No. 16124 Bad News from Virginia on Enforcing USERRA against State Agencies as Employers
  • No. 16126 Great New Third Circuit USERRA Precedent
  • No. 17009 If you Are Claiming that the Firing Violates USERRA, you Can Appeal to the MSPB even if you Are a New Federal Employee
  • No. 17015 USERRA Makes It Unlawful for an Employer To Discriminate Against You Based on Regular or Reserve Military Service, Recently or Long Ago.
  • No. 17016 Proving a Violation of Section 4311 of USERRA: A Case Study
  • No. 17017 Case Study in Proving a Violation of Section 4311 of USERRA
  • No. 17023 Pro Bono Attorney Does Great Job for USERRA Claimant
  • No. 17048 Important New USERRA Case from the 6th Circuit—Part 2
  • No. 17052 The State of Washington Pays out $13 Million for Violating USERRA and Washington’s Veterans’ Preference Law
  • No. 17067 Relationship between USERRA and State Law on Pension Entitlements for Public Employees Who Serve in the Reserve Components
  • No. 17073 New Case about USERRA and Disabled Veterans
  • No. 17074 Recent Case on Section 4311 of USERRA
  • No. 17076 USERRA and Federal Employees
  • No. 17081 DOJ Sues City of Glendale for Violating USERRA
  • No. 17085 New York City Expands its Human Rights Law To Protect Uniformed Service
  • No. 17098 The No FEAR Act Does Not Apply to Discrimination against Reserve Component Service Members
  • No. 17101 Relationship between USERRA and other Federal, State, and Local Laws and Ordinances
  • No. 17102 USERRA and the SCRA for the Military Recruiter
  • No. 17103 Helping the Army Reserve Work Out Problems with the Civilian Employers of Army Reserve Soldiers
  • No. 17106 Firing you Probably Violated USERRA
  • No. 17107 Don’t File an EEO Complaint for a USERRA Violation
  • No. 17109 Great New USERRA Victory in the 9th Circuit
  • No. 17111 Yes, a Reservist Can Be Entitled to Veterans’ Preference
  • No. 17114 The MSPB Has Ground to a Halt
  • No. 17118 The Collective Bargaining Agreement Cannot Deprive the Service Member of the Right To Bid on a Vacation Time
  • No. 18012 Section 4303(2) of USERRA, Definition of “Benefit” of Employment
  • No. 18013 Does USERRA Forbid Employer Harassment of Employees because of their Reserve Component Service? Congress Amends the Definition of “Benefit of Employment” To Clarify that the Answer Is Yes.
  • No. 18015 Enforcing USERRA against a State Government Employer – Good News from California
  • No. 18118 If You Are Claiming a USERRA Violation, the MSPB Has Jurisdiction To Review Your Firing even if You Have Not Completed the Initial Year of Federal Employment
  • No. 18030 Great New Federal Circuit Case about Paid Military Leave for Federal Employees
  • No. 18036 Returning Service Member Who Is Medically Disqualified from Flying Airliners Is Entitled To Return to Payroll and Use Accrued Sick Leave
  • No. 18039 You Don’t Have To Be a Perfect Soldier To Get your Job Back
  • No. 18042 Coast Guard Reservist Loses USERRA Case at MSPB and Federal Circuit
  • No. 18051 To Get Pay Raises that you Would Have Received if Continuously Employed you Must Return to the Pre-Service Employer
  • No. 18052 A Federal Agency Cannot Make You Quit the Reserves—Part 2
  • No. 18053 Section 4316(c) of USERRA: Special Protection against Discharge after Reemployment
  • No. 18070 Can I Sue the Commonwealth of Kentucky For Violating my USERRA Rights?
  • No. 18076 Army Reservist Prevails in Important USERRA Case
  • No. 18080 Recent USERRA Case—Summary Judgment Denied
  • No. 18082 It Is Possible To Bypass the MSPB itself and Appeal the AJ’s Decision to the Federal Circuit
  • No. 18083 Another Interesting Recent USERRA Case
  • No. 18084 Understand and then Insist upon your USERRA Rights
  • No. 18085 Medical Appointments for Service-Connected Disability Do Not Amount to “Service in the Uniformed Services” for Purposes of USERR
  • No. 18086 USERRA Does Not Require an Employer To Accommodate the Military Service of the Spouse of an Employee
  • No. 18087 Reservist Wins USERRA Case against Gojet Airlines
  • No. 18088 USERRA Does Not Protect the Spouse of a Service Member from Discrimination in her Employment
  • No. 18089 Navy Reservist Sues Employer for Violating USERRA and Survives Employer’s Motion for Summary Judgment
  • No. 18101 Extra 22 Days of Paid Military Leave for RC Members on Active Duty in Support of Contingency Operations
  • No. 18103 USERRA, the SCRA, and Military Recruiting
  • No. 18107 Major League Baseball Network Apprenticeship Program Requires USAR Soldiers To Certify that they Won’t Volunteer for Deployment To Be Considered for the Opportunity—Does that Violate USERRA?
  • No. 18111 Right to Reemployment in a Term-Limited Federal Job
  • No. 19001 How Much Military Leave Am I Entitled to under USERRA
  • No. 19002 My Civilian Employer Strenuously Objects to my Enlistment
  • No. 19024 USERRA and Pension Rights of Airline Pilots
  • No. 19038 Actively Participating Reserve Component Members Sue L-3 Communications for Hiring Discrimination and Case Settles
  • No. 19040 How Do I Get Free DOJ Representation for my USERRA Claim?
  • No. 19051 The Federal Circuit Reverses the MSPB yet again
  • No. 19056 USERRA Coverage of National Guard Personnel
  • No. 19063 Excellent New Appellate Case on USERRA
  • No. 19066 You Must Meet USERRA’s Five Conditions for Reemployment to have the Right to an Accommodation for a Service-Connected Disability or The Right to the Special Protection against Discharge
  • No. 19067 You Don’t Need Prior Approval of your Federal Agency Employer To Join a Reserve Component of the Armed Forces
  • No. 19071 Mobilization Interrupts Start of New Job
  • No. 19080 Apply for Reemployment when you Return from Military Service although the Employer Purportedly Fired you on the way out the Door
  • No. 19087 Do I Have To Work on my Day Off? Part Two
  • No. 19096 I Have Been Denied the Right To Telework because of my USAR Service
  • No. 19101 DOJ Sues Walmart for Violating USERRA
  • No. 19107 Seventh Circuit Reverses the Northern District of Illinois in a USERRA Case
  • No. 19112 Another Favorable Appellate Case on Section 4311 of USERRA
  • No. 20007 Important New USERRA Case—Part 1
  • No. 20009 DOL-VETS Found in my Favor—Can my Attorney Get the DOL-VETS Report into Evidence?
  • No. 20042 EEOC Flouts USERRA
  • No. 20049 USERRA Forbids Employer Harassment of Reserve Component Personnel
  • No. 21004 More on Successor in Interest and USERRA
  • No. 21006 Am I Required To Participate in my Civilian Employer’s Investigation while I Am Deployed?
  • No. 21009 Yes, You Can Double Dip
  • No. 21015 New USERRA Lawsuit by Jayson Huntsman
  • No. 21018 The Arkansas Constitution Violates USERRA and Is Void under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.
  • No. 21021 Veterans’ Preference in the Excepted Service
  • No. 21025 Apply for Reemployment with the new Company as well as the Company you Were Working for before your Active Duty
  • No. 21027 Employers and Supervisors: Saying “Thank You for Your Service” Is Not Enough.
  • No. 21035 Am I Required To Participate in my Civilian Employer’s Investigation while I Am Deployed?
  • No. 21039 Can I Earn the Five-Point Veterans’ Preference by Volunteering for Active Duty?
  • No. 21042 New York Law Includes a Provision for your Situation
  • No. 21053 DOL-VETS and DOJ Do well for Army Reservist
  • No. 21054 How Do I Get Free DOJ Representation for my USERRA Case?
  • No. 21055 As a Civilian Employer, the Department of the Navy Must Be Triply the Model Employer.
  • No. 21058 What Kind of a Job Am I Entitled to upon Reemployment?
  • No. 21068 Firing the City Manager Violated USERRA.
  • No. 21069 Does USERRA Apply to ROTC and JROTC?
  • No. 21070 It Is Unlawful for an Employer To Discriminate against those who Have Served in the Military regarding Civilian Pension Entitlements.
  • No. 21080 Your Employer Violated USERRA Willfully, But under Current Law You Are Not Entitled to Monetary Damages. USERRA Needs To Be Amended.
  • No. 22028 Yes, You Can Double-Dip, New Hampshire Law to the Contrary Notwithstanding.
  • No. 22029 USERRA Does Not Protect the Spouse of the Service Member.
  • No. 22033 Computing Damages in a USERRA Case.
  • No. 22037 Depriving You of Paid Military Leave under 5 U.S.C. § 6323 Violates USERRA.
  • No. 22052 A Federal Employee Has only 45 Days To File an EEO Complaint, But That Deadline Does Not Apply to USERRA Complaints
  • No. 22054 USERRA Forbids Discrimination, and that Includes Discrimination in Hiring. Law Firms Are Not Exempt.
  • No. 22056 It Is Unlawful for your Pre-Service Employer, a Federal Agency, To Fire you for Exceeding the Five-Year Limit.
  • No. 22057 National Guard Technicians Are Not Entitled To Receive Paid Military Leave under 5 U.S.C. § 6323(a)(1) when they Are on AGR Duty. They Are Entitled to Paid Military Leave when they Are on other forms of Military Duty.
  • No. 22065 USERRA Applies to Service in the Active Component of the Armed Forces, as well as National Guard and Reserve Service.
  • No. 22071 You Must Give this National Guard Member a Military Leave of Absence for her MUTA-5 Training.
  • No. 23001 USERRA, the SCRA, and Military Recruiting
  • No. 23015 Don’t Try To Work at your Civilian Job while you Are on Active Duty—Part 4
  • No. 23027 What Is a Prohibited Personnel Practice (PPP)? My Federal Supervisor Has Willfully Violated USERRA. Is that a PPP?
  • No. 23029 PHS Officers Are Protected by USERRA, But PHS Officers Are Not Entitled to Paid Military Leave under 5 U.S.C. § 6323.
  • No. 23030 The Wrong Way To Assert that your Employer Violated USERRA
  • No. 23032 Recent USERRA Decision in the Northern District of Illinois
  • No. 23034 Yes, USERRA Applies to “Temporary” Jobs.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *