Law Reviews

2,087 law reviews

• 24041You Must Sign the Settlement Agreement to Get Relief
• 24040Recent Supreme Court Decision May Detract from the Weight Given to DOL USERRA Regulations
• 24039TERA Medical Opinions for PACT Act Claims
• 24038USERRA’s Furlough or Leave of Absence Clause Applied to Local Police Officers
• 24037USERRA’s Furlough or Leave of Absence Clause Is Not Just for Airline Pilots
• 24036DOJ Sues Oklahoma City Public Schools for Violating USERRA
• 24035Contingency Military Service: Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Two Cases; Amicus Briefs Filed by ROA
• 24034Meet the 5 USERRA Conditions for Reemployment
• 24033Employer Must Treat You as Continuously Employed if You Meet USERRA Conditions
• 24032USERRA Enforcement
• 24031New SCRA Provision Makes Occupational Licenses Portable
• 24030Ward v. Shelby County — The Saga Continues
• 24029Right to Terminate a Lease Early upon Receipt of PCS Orders
• 24028Why ROA Files Amicus Curiae Briefs
• 24027Rudisill v. McDonough: A Great Victory in the Supreme Court.
• 24026“Duty to Assist”: VA’s Obligation to Help Veterans Develop Claims for Benefits.

  Contributed by Chisolm Chisolm & Kilpatrick LTD

• 24025“Bad Paper”: How Discharge Status Affects VA Benefits Eligibility
• 24024Seven Myths about the Military Survivor Benefit Plan
• 24023Seven Myths about Military Pension Division
• 24022ROA Files Amicus Brief Supporting Broad Interpretation of 5 U.S.C. §5538
• 24021USERRA Applies to National Guard Technicians
• 24020A National Guard Technician Is a Federal Employee
• 24019Florida State Guard vs Florida National Guard
• 24018Delayed Reemployment Due to Hospitalization after Active Duty
• 24017Congress: Enact No-Cost Dental Coverage for Selected Reserve
• 24016Job-Protected Leave for Required Dental Exams before Mobilization
• 24015The Survivor Benefit Plan Explained
• 24014DOJ Sues Nevada Again for Flouting USERRA
• 24013Recent USERRA Decision in Northern District of Illinois (UPDATED 2026)
• 24012Returning Service Member’s Right to Proper Reinstatement
• 24011Civilian Pension Credit Requires Meeting All USERRA Conditions
• 24010Courts Must Liberally Construe Statutes for Service Members
• 24009Constitutionality of Tax Benefits for Veterans’ Organizations
• 24008Domicile Discussion for Military Legal Assistance Attorneys
• 24005Civilian Pension Credit and the Five-Year Limit
• 24004Global USERRA Coverage and Reemployment Rights
• 24002Advocating for Written Informed Consent for Military Members
• 23066Awarding the Successful USERRA Plaintiff Attorney Fees Should Be Mandatory, Not Discretionary.
• 23065Congress Should Expand the Remedies Available to the Successful USERRA Plaintiff.
• 23064Congress Should Expand USERRA’s Prohibition of Retaliation Against an Employee for Exercising his or her USERRA Rights.
• 23063The Primary Purpose of USERRA Is To Encourage Qualified Young Persons To Serve our Country in Uniform. As Presently Enacted, USERRA’s Stated Purpose Is To Encourage Non-career Service.
• 23062USERRA for Students: USERRA Does Not Apply to Students, But another Federal Law Provides similar Protections.
• 23061Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety: New Developments on Remand
• 23060Leaving a Job at one Federal Department To Take a Job at another Department Does Not Give You a Fresh Five-Year Limit under USERRA.
• 23059Do Israeli Defense Force Reservists Who Live and Work in the U.S. Have Reemployment Rights under USERRA? No.
• 23058Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corporation, the First Supreme Court Decision under the 1940 Reemployment Statute.
• 23057What Is an Entry-Level Separation? Is a Recipient of An Entry-Level Separation Entitled to Reemployment in his or her Pre-Service Civilian Job?
• 23056You Are Entitled to Time Off from your Civilian Job for a Friday Night Shift so that you Can Be Rested and Fit for Duty for your Saturday Drill.
• 23055Can an Individual who Enlists in the Armed Forces Today Get the Five Point Veterans’ Preference in Federal Civilian Employment? No.
• 23054My Daughter Is Leaving a Department of the Army Civilian Job ToEnter Active Duty. Should they Put her on “Absent-US” Status?