Law Reviews

2,087 law reviews

• 09028Not So ‘Harmless Error’: Supreme Court decides against veteran in claim process case
• 09026Mobilized Reservists and the Chicago Fire Department
• 09025No Time Limit on Justice for the Returning Veteran
• 09024Dot the I’s and Cross the T’s
• 0902315th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Monroe v. Standard Oil Co. 452 U.S. 549 (1981)
• 09022Is Personal Animus Discrimination? A USERRA case may be headed to the Supreme Court.
• 09022Update: Supreme Court Agrees To Review Unfavorable 7th Circuit Case
• 09021Federal Circuit Again Reverses the MSPB for Ignoring Rights of Veterans
• 0901914th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Coffy v. Republic Steel Corp.,447 U.S. 191 (1980)
• 09018DOJ Sues Alabama DMHMR
• 09017Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of the SSCRA
• 0901513th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Alabama Power Co. v. Davis, 431 U.S. 581 (1977)
• 09012DOJ Sues NC to Enforce USERRA Regarding a Magistrate Who Is a Reservist
• 09012Update: DOJ Sues NC to Enforce USERRA Regarding a Magistrate Who Is a Reservist
• 09011Layoffs and the Special Protection Period
• 09010You Must Apply for Reemployment after You Leave Active Duty
• 09009Another New Case on USERRA Discrimination
• 09008The SSCRA Means What It Says, Supreme Court Holds
• 0900712th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Foster v. Dravo Corp., 420 U.S. 92 (1975)
• 09006When Long Service Equals No Promotion You Don’t Need a Smoking Gun to Win a Section 4311 Case Under USERRA
• 09005Do Life Insurance Salespersons Have USERRA Rights?
• 09004How to Prove a USERRA Discrimination Case—Continued
• 09003Eleventh Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Eagar v. Magma Copper Co., 389 U.S. 323 (1967)
• 09002Naval Reservist Wins USERRA Case Against San Diego Police Department
• 09001Non-Pecuniary Damages Available Under USERRA
• 09001Update: Smith v. United States Postal Service
• 0863USERRA Applies to Salespersons on Commission
• 0862Recalled Reservist Tackles Health Flexible Saving Arrangement
• 086110th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Accardi v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 383 U.S. 225 (1966)
• 0860Harassment Is a Cognizable Claim under USERRA
• 0859The Ordinance and the Ordained: USERRA does not afford protection to clergy as it does to other employees
• 0858Right to Jury Trial and Liquidated Damages Survives Death of the Unlawfully Fired Employee
• 0857You Cannot Waive Your Reemployment Rights Until You Return from Service
• 0856Unlawful for Airline To Deny You Free-Space-Available Travel to Your Drill—Right to Time Off for Travel to and from Your Drill Weekend
• 0855Mobilized Reservist Should Not Miss Out on Promotion Opportunities
• 0854Legal Assistance for Wounded Warriors—USERRA Component
• 0853Ninth Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Brooks v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.. 376 U.S. 182 (1964)
• 0852Intelligence Not Superior: USERRA applies to Intelligence agencies.
• 0851More Than Workers’ Comp: Employer’s USERRA obligation applies to Reservist injured on drill
• 0850Veterans’ Preference Act Enforcement
• 0849Unlawful to Fire Army Recruit
• 0848Enforcing USERRA against a State—Part 2
• 0847Proposed Servicemembers Access to Justice Act
• 0847Update: Proposed Servicemembers Access to Justice Act
• 0846Eighth Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Tilton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 376 U.S. 169 (1964)
• 0845Law Gives Small Businesses Tax Credit on Differential Pay
• 0843Important New Law for Military Families Affects Civilian Employers
• 0842Seventh Supreme Court Case on Reemployment Statute McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co.
• 0841How NOT To Prove a Discrimination Case Under USERRA
• 0840My Mobilization Comes at a Terrible Time for my Employer