Law Reviews

1,954 law reviews

• 09005Do Life Insurance Salespersons Have USERRA Rights?
• 09004How to Prove a USERRA Discrimination Case—Continued
• 09003Eleventh Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Eagar v. Magma Copper Co., 389 U.S. 323 (1967)
• 09002Naval Reservist Wins USERRA Case Against San Diego Police Department
• 09001Non-Pecuniary Damages Available Under USERRA
• 09001Update: Smith v. United States Postal Service
• 0863USERRA Applies to Salespersons on Commission
• 0862Recalled Reservist Tackles Health Flexible Saving Arrangement
• 086110th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Accardi v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 383 U.S. 225 (1966)
• 0860Harassment Is a Cognizable Claim under USERRA
• 0859The Ordinance and the Ordained: USERRA does not afford protection to clergy as it does to other employees
• 0858Right to Jury Trial and Liquidated Damages Survives Death of the Unlawfully Fired Employee
• 0857You Cannot Waive Your Reemployment Rights Until You Return from Service
• 0856Unlawful for Airline To Deny You Free-Space-Available Travel to Your Drill—Right to Time Off for Travel to and from Your Drill Weekend
• 0855Mobilized Reservist Should Not Miss Out on Promotion Opportunities
• 0854Legal Assistance for Wounded Warriors—USERRA Component
• 0853Ninth Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Brooks v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.. 376 U.S. 182 (1964)
• 0852Intelligence Not Superior: USERRA applies to Intelligence agencies.
• 0851More Than Workers’ Comp: Employer’s USERRA obligation applies to Reservist injured on drill
• 0850Veterans’ Preference Act Enforcement
• 0849Unlawful to Fire Army Recruit
• 0848Enforcing USERRA against a State—Part 2
• 0847Proposed Servicemembers Access to Justice Act
• 0847Update: Proposed Servicemembers Access to Justice Act
• 0846Eighth Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Tilton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 376 U.S. 169 (1964)
• 0845Law Gives Small Businesses Tax Credit on Differential Pay
• 0843Important New Law for Military Families Affects Civilian Employers
• 0842Seventh Supreme Court Case on Reemployment Statute McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co.
• 0841How NOT To Prove a Discrimination Case Under USERRA
• 0840My Mobilization Comes at a Terrible Time for my Employer
• 0839SCRA Does Not Apply to Arbitration Proceedings, But It Should
• 0838Right to Reemployment at the End of the Initial Active Obligated Service
• 0837USERRA Coverage for Individuals Performing National Guard AGR Duty
• 0836USERRA Coverage for National Guard Technicians
• 0835Paid Military Leave for Federal Employees on Long-Term Military Duty
• 0834Sixth Supreme Court Case on Reemployment Statute Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.
• 0833Keep your employer informed about when to expect your return
• 0832Wounded Servicemember Reporting Back to Civilian Job
• 0831Applying for Reemployment after Military Service
• 0830Servicemembers Precluded from Tort Recovery for Personal Injury or Death Incident to Service
• 0829USERRA Overrides the Interests of the Replacement Employee
• 0828Fifth Supreme Court Case on Reemployment Statute Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman, 345 U.S. 330 (1953)
• 0827Returning Veterans & NSPS: DoD’s National Security Personnel System generates USERRA complaints
• 0826Hard Cases Make Bad Law—Part Two
• 0825Hard Cases Make Bad Law
• 0824Update: Congress Enacts New Legislation Precluding Statutes of Limitation in USERRA Cases
• 0824USERRA and Statute of Limitations—Continued
• 0823Fourth Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 338 U.S. 278
• 0822Time Management: Don’t confuse the five-year limit with the 90-day deadline
• 0821The Burden of Freedom: Recent USERRA burdens on employers are not unconstitutional or unprecedented