Law Reviews

1,954 law reviews

• 0820Third Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute: Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 727 v. Campbell
• 0819Congress Emphasizes that SCRA Applies to Child Custody Proceedings
• 0818My Professional License Has Expired-Part 2
• 0817Now You Can Designate Beneficiaries for the Death Gratuity
• 0816Enhanced Leave Entitlements for Family Caregivers of Wounded Warriors
• 0814Vets May Give a Military Salute Thanks to Benefits-Filled NDAA
• 0813Despite its longtime contention, AAFES is not exempt from USERRA
• 0812Prior Notice To Employer Not Required To Predict Return To Job
• 0811Notice to Civilian Employer Not Requesting a Leave of Absence
• 0810Attempt to Expedite USERRA Enforcement Process
• 0809Second Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute: Trailmobile Corp. v. Whirls, 331 U.S. 40 (1947)
• 0808The Meaning in Shift: Daytime work is part of the “status” to which the returning veteran is entitled
• 0807Bonus Bust: Mobilization deprives Soldier of earned bonus at civilian job
• 0806Taxation of Disability Retirement Benefits
• 0804USERRA Applies to Employment as Adjunct Professor
• 0803First Supreme Court Case on Reemployment Statute: Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp., 328 U.S. 275 (1946).
• 0802Legislation addresses retroactive promotions for World War II Navy and Marine Corps POWs
• 0801Supreme Court holds that veterans’ preference is not sex discrimination
• 0763The Office of Personnel Management has specific responsibilities under USERRA
• 0762Airline discourages Reserve service with contrary paycheck, insurance, and leave policies
• 0761Veterans’ Preference Act requires a federal agency to waive maximum age rule
• 0760Second Careers: USERRA applies to retirees voluntarily returning to Active Duty
• 0759Get In the Vote: GAO issues scathing report on voting woes for military members.
• 0758Taking the Leap: Employer cover-up fools DOL, but not the jury
• 0757Buy Back Time: Your primer on the Civil Service Retirement System in regards to military service.
• 0756Laid Off and Called Up: Layoffs still employment relationships under USERRA, other factors may keep you from getting your old job back
• 0755The Federal Case: A description of USERRA’s enforcement mechanisms for complaints by federal government employees.
• 0754Firmer Teeth: Legislation introduced to enhance USERRA enforcement.
• 0753A ‘Motivating Factor’: USERRA case reiterates that military duty need only contribute to termination of employment to be a violation of the law
• 0752Habit Forming: Federal Circuit reverses MSPB two more times.
• 0751Rules Change for Flying Flag at Half-Staff
• 0750Target Hit: National Guard member wins USERRA case plus tort damages under state law.
• 0748Federal Law and New York Law Governing Non-Federal Public Employees in New York and Military Service
• 0747Russell v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
• 0746USERRA Forbids Discrimination in Initial Hiring
• 0745Recent Ohio Supreme Court Case on USERRA Enforcement
• 0744How the Death Gratuity Could Be Better Handled for Forgotten Military Orphans: Legislative Proposals for Congress to Consider
• 0743Death Gratuity and the “Blended” Military Family
• 0742Predatory Lending: Servicemembers get new protections from some loan practices.
• 0741Am I Permitted to Make Up Missed Employee Contributions to My Pension Plan Account after Leaving the Employ of My Pre-Service Employer?
• 0740Federal Employees Protected from RIF during Military Service
• 0739Burden of Proof in Section 4311 Cases
• 0738Successor in Interest-Continued
• 0737Right to Trial by Jury under USERRA
• 0736Proposal to Require Employers to Grant Leave for Family Member of Wounded Warrior
• 0734GAO Reports on USERRA Enforcement
• 0733City of Columbus Held Not Liable for Suicide of Returning Veteran
• 0732USERRA Applies to Deferred Compensation Plans
• 0731Another Recent Case on the Burden of Proof in USERRA
• 0730Are Schedule C Employees Protected by USERRA?