Law Reviews

2,087 law reviews

• 11028Erickson v. United States Postal Service – Recent Implications to 38 U.S.C. 4311 & 4312
• 11027USERRA Prohibition Against Retaliation May Extend to Service Member’s Spouse Who Works for the Same Employer
• 11026Can We Fire Him for Going over the Five-Year Limit?
• 11025Furloughs and the Five-Year Limit
• 11023The Case of the Misplaced Parentheses: Punctuation can impact USERRA five-year rule.
• 11022Supreme Court Reverses 7th Circuit in USERRA Case
• 11021Proposed Private Right of Action under UOCAVA
• 11020Double Serving Not Double Dipping
• 11019USERRA and Public Sector Pension Plans
• 11018Fourth Circuit Holds New SCRA Private Right of Action is Retroactive
• 11017Hawaii Legislature Enacts Legislation Protecting Military Parents in Child Custody Disputes
• 11015No Age Limit on USERRA Protection
• 11014Student Loans Are Now Subject to SCRA 6% Interest Rate Cap
• 11013Revised Military Voting in Chicago Mayoral Election
• 11012Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment for Employer
• 11011DOJ Settles USERRA Suit Against Titan Laboratories
• 11010USERRA Section 4302 Does Not Bar Settlement of USERRA Claim
• 11009USERRA Does Not Protect Absence from Work To Attend DEP Meetings
• 11008MSPB Holds that Disparate Impact Discrimination Is Not a Cognizable Claim under USERRA
• 11007I Never Asked To Continue My Health Insurance When I Left the Job To Serve
• 11006Important New Case on USERRA Discrimination
• 11005Virginia-Please Don’t Disenfranchise Military Personnel in Primaries
• 11004The Federal Government Is Not Bound by Incorrect Advice
• 11003The MSPB Is Finally Catching On
• 11002USERRA’s Five-Year Limit Applies to Employer Relationship
• 11001Concessions on All Sides: Employers, as well as Reservists, must bear the brunt of the extended deployments and separation from work.
• 10099Law Review 1008 Reconsidered
• 10098Paid Military Leave for National Guard Technicians
• 10097Is It Feasible To Expand the Active Component to Relieve the Burden on Employers of Reserve Component Personnel?
• 10096Prior Notice to Civilian Employer – Part 2
• 10095Prior Notice to Civilian Employer
• 10094Coverage for National Guard Members on State Duty
• 10093Great Victory for Military Voting Rights
• 10091Safeguarding Military Voting Rights: Progress Made and What Remains To Be Done
• 10090Federal Civilian Retirement Credit for Military Service
• 10089USERRA Most Definitely Applies to National Guard Members Performing Border Protection Duty
• 10088Privacy Act Applies to National Guard Even When Not Federalized
• 10087USERRA Forbids Discrimination in Initial Employment
• 10086Military Family Law Primer
• 10085Improve the SCRA: Progress Made and What Remains To Be Done
• 10084Congress Overrides State “Source Tax” Rules
• 10083Congress Beefs up the SCRA Enforcement Mechanism
• 10082USERRA and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, Offer of Judgment: Awards of Plaintiff’s Attorney Fees and Prohibition of Charging Costs Under USERRA Are Not Affected by Rule 68.
• 10080Congress Orders a New Demonstration Project on USERRA Enforcement
• 10079Congress Strengthens SCRA Provision on Terminating Lease of Premises or Vehicle upon Activation, Deployment, or PCS Orders
• 10078Don’t Sacrifice Military Personnel to “Paperwork Problems” in Foreclosures
• 10077Enhancing the Protections of USERRA: Progress Made, and What Remains To Be Accomplished
• 10076Congress Strengthens USERRA’s Protection against Discrimination
• 10075Congress Clarifies the Application of USERRA to Successors in Interest
• 10074New York, Illinois Fail to Deliver Absentee Ballots