Law Reviews
1,954 law reviews
- 11006Important New Case on USERRA Discrimination
- 11005Virginia-Please Don’t Disenfranchise Military Personnel in Primaries
- 11004The Federal Government Is Not Bound by Incorrect Advice
- 11003The MSPB Is Finally Catching On
- 11002USERRA’s Five-Year Limit Applies to Employer Relationship
- 11001Concessions on All Sides: Employers, as well as Reservists, must bear the brunt of the extended deployments and separation from work.
- 10099Law Review 1008 Reconsidered
- 10098Paid Military Leave for National Guard Technicians
- 10097Is It Feasible To Expand the Active Component to Relieve the Burden on Employers of Reserve Component Personnel?
- 10096Prior Notice to Civilian Employer – Part 2
- 10095Prior Notice to Civilian Employer
- 10094Coverage for National Guard Members on State Duty
- 10093Great Victory for Military Voting Rights
- 10091Safeguarding Military Voting Rights: Progress Made and What Remains To Be Done
- 10090Federal Civilian Retirement Credit for Military Service
- 10089USERRA Most Definitely Applies to National Guard Members Performing Border Protection Duty
- 10088Privacy Act Applies to National Guard Even When Not Federalized
- 10087USERRA Forbids Discrimination in Initial Employment
- 10086Military Family Law Primer
- 10085Improve the SCRA: Progress Made and What Remains To Be Done
- 10084Congress Overrides State “Source Tax” Rules
- 10083Congress Beefs up the SCRA Enforcement Mechanism
- 10082USERRA and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, Offer of Judgment: Awards of Plaintiff’s Attorney Fees and Prohibition of Charging Costs Under USERRA Are Not Affected by Rule 68.
- 10080Congress Orders a New Demonstration Project on USERRA Enforcement
- 10079Congress Strengthens SCRA Provision on Terminating Lease of Premises or Vehicle upon Activation, Deployment, or PCS Orders
- 10078Don’t Sacrifice Military Personnel to “Paperwork Problems” in Foreclosures
- 10077Enhancing the Protections of USERRA: Progress Made, and What Remains To Be Accomplished
- 10076Congress Strengthens USERRA’s Protection against Discrimination
- 10075Congress Clarifies the Application of USERRA to Successors in Interest
- 10074New York, Illinois Fail to Deliver Absentee Ballots
- 10073A Small Price: Laws on the books protect the few who sacrifice for the many.
- 10072Military Absentee Voting in Maryland
- 10071Maryland Court of Appeals Case on Military Voting
- 10070DOJ Sues New York To Enfranchise Military Voters
- 10069No Wife, No Kids—Am I Eligible to Elect RC-SBP?
- 10068If I Choose the RC-SBP and then Die, When Does My Husband Get the Cash?
- 10067My Big Bank Will Be Taken Over by Bigger Bank
- 10066USERRA Overrides Federal Agency Rule on “Outside Employment”
- 10065Is the Stolen Valor Act Unconstitutional?
- 10064Suit Filed To Protect Military Voting Rights in Maryland
- 10056Maryland Will Meet the 45-Day Standard, But Only for Federal Offices
- 10055DOD Acts on MOVE Act Waiver Requests
- 10054Don’t Do Your Reserve Work on Your Employer’s Time
- 10053Calling Yourself an Independent Contractor Does Not Make You One
- 10052Readmission of Servicemembers to Postsecondary Institutions – Details Regarding the Department of Education (DOE) Regulations Implementing the New Law on Mandatory Readmission of Mobilized Reserve and Guard and Active Duty Students
- 10051Alabama Ordered To Comply with USERRA
- 10050USERRA Applies to Managerial and Executive Jobs
- 10049Injunctive Relief under USERRA
- 10048James B. Hurley’s Saga Continues
- 10046USERRA Damages Can Be Awarded for Lost Military Pay