- No. 0864 Another New Appellate Case Shows USERRA Has Teeth
- No. 0863 USERRA Applies to Salespersons on Commission
- No. 0863 Update (March 2009)
- No. 0862 Recalled Reservist Tackles Health Flexible Saving Arrangement
- No. 0861 10th Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Accardi v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 383 U.S. 225 (1966)
- No. 0860 Harassment Is a Cognizable Claim under USERRA
- No. 0859 The Ordinance and the Ordained: USERRA does not afford protection to clergy as it does to other employees
- No. 0858 Right to Jury Trial and Liquidated Damages Survives Death of the Unlawfully Fired Employee
- No. 0857 You Cannot Waive Your Reemployment Rights Until You Return from Service
- No. 0856 Unlawful for Airline To Deny You Free-Space-Available Travel to Your Drill—Right to Time Off for Travel to and from Your Drill Weekend
- No. 0855 Mobilized Reservist Should Not Miss Out on Promotion Opportunities
- No. 0854 Legal Assistance for Wounded Warriors—USERRA Component
- No. 0853 Ninth Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Brooks v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.. 376 U.S. 182 (1964)
- No. 0852 Intelligence Not Superior: USERRA applies to Intelligence agencies.
- No. 0851 More Than Workers’ Comp: Employer’s USERRA obligation applies to Reservist injured on drill
- No. 0850 Veterans’ Preference Act Enforcement
- No. 0849 Unlawful to Fire Army Recruit
- No. 0848 Enforcing USERRA against a State—Part 2
- No. 0847 Update: Proposed Servicemembers Access to Justice Act
- No. 0847 Proposed Servicemembers Access to Justice Act
- No. 0846 Eighth Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Tilton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 376 U.S. 169 (1964)
- No. 0845 Law Gives Small Businesses Tax Credit on Differential Pay
- No. 0844 Vacation Days: A recent settlement casts a new light on vacation accrual for Reservists who take time off for military training or service
- No. 0843 Important New Law for Military Families Affects Civilian Employers
- No. 0842 Seventh Supreme Court Case on Reemployment Statute McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co.
- No. 0841 How NOT To Prove a Discrimination Case Under USERRA
- No. 0840 My Mobilization Comes at a Terrible Time for my Employer
- No. 0839 SCRA Does Not Apply to Arbitration Proceedings, But It Should
- No. 0838 Right to Reemployment at the End of the Initial Active Obligated Service
- No. 0837 USERRA Coverage for Individuals Performing National Guard AGR Duty
- No. 0836 USERRA Coverage for National Guard Technicians
- No. 0835 Paid Military Leave for Federal Employees on Long-Term Military Duty
- No. 0834 Sixth Supreme Court Case on Reemployment Statute Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.
- No. 0833 Keep your employer informed about when to expect your return
- No. 0832 Wounded Servicemember Reporting Back to Civilian Job
- No. 0831 Applying for Reemployment after Military Service
- No. 0830 Servicemembers Precluded from Tort Recovery for Personal Injury or Death Incident to Service
- No. 0829 USERRA Overrides the Interests of the Replacement Employee
- No. 0828 Fifth Supreme Court Case on Reemployment Statute Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman, 345 U.S. 330 (1953)
- No. 0827 Returning Veterans & NSPS: DoD’s National Security Personnel System generates USERRA complaints
- No. 0826 Update: Hard Cases Make Bad Law—Part Two
- No. 0826 Hard Cases Make Bad Law—Part Two
- No. 0825 Hard Cases Make Bad Law
- No. 0824 USERRA and Statute of Limitations—Continued
- No. 0824 Update Congress Enacts New Legislation Precluding Statutes of Limitation in USERRA Cases
- No. 0823 Fourth Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 338 U.S. 278
- No. 0822 Time Management: Don’t confuse the five-year limit with the 90-day deadline
- No. 0821 The Burden of Freedom: Recent USERRA burdens on employers are not unconstitutional or unprecedented
- No. 0820 Third Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute: Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 727 v. Campbell
- No. 0819 Congress Emphasizes that SCRA Applies to Child Custody Proceedings
- No. 0818 My Professional License Has Expired-Part 2
- No. 0817 Now You Can Designate Beneficiaries for the Death Gratuity
- No. 0816 Enhanced Leave Entitlements for Family Caregivers of Wounded Warriors
- *No. 0815 New Reporting Requirement for ESGR Cases
- No. 0814 Vets May Give a Military Salute Thanks to Benefits-Filled NDAA
- No. 0813 Despite its longtime contention, AAFES is not exempt from USERRA
- No. 0812 Prior Notice To Employer Not Required To Predict Return To Job
- No. 0811 Notice to Civilian Employer Not Requesting a Leave of Absence
- No. 0810 Attempt to Expedite USERRA Enforcement Process
- No. 0809 Second Supreme Court Case Relating to Reemployment Statute: Trailmobile Corp. v. Whirls, 331 U.S. 40 (1947)
- No. 0808 The Meaning in Shift: Daytime work is part of the “status” to which the returning veteran is entitled
- No. 0807 Bonus Bust: Mobilization deprives Soldier of earned bonus at civilian job
- No. 0806 Taxation of Disability Retirement Benefits
- *No. 00805 USERRA Does Not Apply to Students-Part 3
- No. 0804 USERRA Applies to Employment as Adjunct Professor
- No. 0803 First Supreme Court Case on Reemployment Statute: Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp., 328 U.S. 275 (1946).
- No. 0802 Legislation addresses retroactive promotions for World War II Navy and Marine Corps POWs
- No. 0801 Supreme Court holds that veterans’ preference is not sex discrimination
X